Difference between revisions of "Template talk:News"

From The Infosphere, the Futurama Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(Sixth Season?!: new section)
(Sixth Season?!)
Line 10: Line 10:
 
== Sixth Season?! ==
 
== Sixth Season?! ==
  
[http://www.inquisitr.com/18383/futurama-might-return-to-fox/ Make it news!]
+
[http://www.inquisitr.com/18383/futurama-might-return-to-fox/ Make it news!] <small>-- the preceding unsigned comment was written by [[User:Buddy13|Buddy13]]{{#if:|&nbsp;before {{{2}}}|}}.</small>
 +
:"Might" is also an indicator for speculation.  Also, Buddy, you can see my analysis of it at [http://www.futurama-madhouse.com.ar/#1235665510,95360, the Madhouse]. --'''[[User:Svip|Svip]]'''<sup>[[User talk:Svip|Talk]]</sup> 00:40, 27 February 2009 (UTC)

Revision as of 00:40, 27 February 2009

News is more important than new Infosphere pages. Perhaps as old items are dropped, they could be added to a News Archive? Thoughts? --Buddy 15:42, 8 July 2007 (PDT)

Sounds like a good idea. --SvipTalk 15:58, 8 July 2007 (PDT)
I don't think anyone will call that a bad idea. I'll go ahead and put the old news into the archive. - Quolnok 17:58, 8 July 2007 (PDT)

Another screenjabber review

I'd add it, but I don't know where to stick the item that falls off the bottom. It's here. There are some spoilers, but he claims he's being more careful about that. --Buddy 01:36, 24 December 2008 (UTC)

Uhm, Buddy. That's the exact same review we already have on the news bulletin. Are you drunk? --SvipTalk 13:45, 24 December 2008 (UTC)

Sixth Season?!

Make it news! -- the preceding unsigned comment was written by Buddy13.

"Might" is also an indicator for speculation. Also, Buddy, you can see my analysis of it at the Madhouse. --SvipTalk 00:40, 27 February 2009 (UTC)