Template talk:News

From The Infosphere, the Futurama Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search

News is more important than new Infosphere pages. Perhaps as old items are dropped, they could be added to a News Archive? Thoughts? --Buddy 15:42, 8 July 2007 (PDT)

Sounds like a good idea. --SvipTalk 15:58, 8 July 2007 (PDT)
I don't think anyone will call that a bad idea. I'll go ahead and put the old news into the archive. - Quolnok 17:58, 8 July 2007 (PDT)

Another screenjabber review

I'd add it, but I don't know where to stick the item that falls off the bottom. It's here. There are some spoilers, but he claims he's being more careful about that. --Buddy 01:36, 24 December 2008 (UTC)

Uhm, Buddy. That's the exact same review we already have on the news bulletin. Are you drunk? --SvipTalk 13:45, 24 December 2008 (UTC)

Sixth Season?!

Make it news! -- the preceding unsigned comment was written by Buddy13.

"Might" is also an indicator for speculation. Also, Buddy, you can see my analysis of it at the Madhouse. --SvipTalk 00:40, 27 February 2009 (UTC)

Sneak preview of 6ACV01

On the Animation SuperCon in Florida on 4 October, David X. Cohen along with the male cast, gave a sneak peak of the first three minutes of the first episode's animatic.[12] The original concept was for the story to take place in a new universe, but Matt Groening wanted to do the rebirth instead.[2] This sneak preview was leaked unto YouTube on October 4 (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6wwUw0FQmDo). Aki 23:56, 4 October 2009 (UTC)

RSS Feed?

I'd like to add the latest Futurama News from this site to my RSS reader. Is there an RSS feed that I can use?

There's an RSS feed of edits, but I think one for the "News" template would need to be manually created... Unless I'm wrong. --Buddy (talk) 18:38, 2 February 2012 (CET)
Right, I found the one for edits, but I'd like one for the news. What would be required to create one? This wiki is the best source of Futurama news that I've found so far.

"for a fourth time"

Devil's hands, Wild green, Meanwhile and ?

Aren't those three [the] only actual ends? - Quolnok (talk) 01:59, 23 April 2013 (CEST)

Someone could be thinking of Reincarnation. I believe it was conceived to be an ending to the series in the event of cancellation, but nothing officially happened. -- DeepSpaceHomer (talk) 03:52, 23 April 2013 (CEST)
I suppose so. But the wording suggests it actually ended, on that occasion it was renewed before the episode aired. - Quolnok (talk) 05:20, 23 April 2013 (CEST)
If you ask me, and I suppose you don't, this is only the second time. The films should not be considered a run in itself, that can be cancelled. What was in limbo at the time was whether the show would return to television afterwards. We have a rather decent article on the matter. --Sviptalk 06:40, 23 April 2013 (CEST)
Problem is clearly the word "end". Ended (cancelled) twice, which is the important thing. Ended (no production taking place, nothing left to show) soon to be thrice. Ended (episode/film written as a conclusion), erm, quartz. - Quolnok (talk) 08:24, 23 April 2013 (CEST)
Some would also argue on the semantics of "cancelled" vs. "not renewed", so "end" is probably the word to use. --Buddy (talk) 09:01, 23 April 2013 (CEST)