Difference between revisions of "Table:Oh dear!"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
:::Seriously, we need a system to make sure we don't rely so heavily on reprises. For a while, it was just me and Sanfazer, but then I kinda forgot about it. How can we get more nominations? | :::Seriously, we need a system to make sure we don't rely so heavily on reprises. For a while, it was just me and Sanfazer, but then I kinda forgot about it. How can we get more nominations? | ||
::::For quite a while I was the only one nominating and creating features. There were occasional votes. Should we consider dropping back to monthly? That needs less nominations. - [[User:Quolnok|Quolnok]] ([[User talk:Quolnok|talk]]) 01:42, 21 August 2012 (CEST) | ::::For quite a while I was the only one nominating and creating features. There were occasional votes. Should we consider dropping back to monthly? That needs less nominations. - [[User:Quolnok|Quolnok]] ([[User talk:Quolnok|talk]]) 01:42, 21 August 2012 (CEST) | ||
:::::Well, that depends. On one hand, you're right, that does require much less nominations, and it takes less votes to keep it up. On the other hand, we have more than enough articles to keep up fortnights, and it seems like a bit of a cop-out when we could come up with a system to get more people to vote.[[User:Kif|Kif]] ([[User talk:Kif|talk]]) 01:53, 21 August 2012 (CEST) | |||
Revision as of 01:53, 21 August 2012
Discussion
It seems nobody got arount to setting a featured article on this particular fortnight. Do we have one ready to go? --Buddy (talk) 21:14, 19 August 2012 (CEST)
- Didn't Quolnok have a script to just use the previous year's featured article if that happened? --Sviptalk 21:21, 19 August 2012 (CEST)
- Yep, and that's still in play, but there wasn't one for this fortnight last year either. I originally had them pointing back to 2009 regardless of what year it is since I know 2009 has all fortnights filled in correctly. I've pointed it back to the 2010 one. Script might need some tweaking. - Quolnok (talk) 03:07, 20 August 2012 (CEST)
- Seriously, we need a system to make sure we don't rely so heavily on reprises. For a while, it was just me and Sanfazer, but then I kinda forgot about it. How can we get more nominations?
- For quite a while I was the only one nominating and creating features. There were occasional votes. Should we consider dropping back to monthly? That needs less nominations. - Quolnok (talk) 01:42, 21 August 2012 (CEST)
- Well, that depends. On one hand, you're right, that does require much less nominations, and it takes less votes to keep it up. On the other hand, we have more than enough articles to keep up fortnights, and it seems like a bit of a cop-out when we could come up with a system to get more people to vote.Kif (talk) 01:53, 21 August 2012 (CEST)
- For quite a while I was the only one nominating and creating features. There were occasional votes. Should we consider dropping back to monthly? That needs less nominations. - Quolnok (talk) 01:42, 21 August 2012 (CEST)
- Seriously, we need a system to make sure we don't rely so heavily on reprises. For a while, it was just me and Sanfazer, but then I kinda forgot about it. How can we get more nominations?
- Yep, and that's still in play, but there wasn't one for this fortnight last year either. I originally had them pointing back to 2009 regardless of what year it is since I know 2009 has all fortnights filled in correctly. I've pointed it back to the 2010 one. Script might need some tweaking. - Quolnok (talk) 03:07, 20 August 2012 (CEST)