Difference between revisions of "Talk:Defrostee"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Created page with "Shouldn't this be just put on the Coinage page? ~~~~") |
|||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Shouldn't this be just put on the [[Coinage]] page? [[User:DannyJC13|DannyJC13]] ([[User talk:DannyJC13|talk]]) 15:27, 26 December 2011 (CET) | Shouldn't this be just put on the [[Coinage]] page? [[User:DannyJC13|DannyJC13]] ([[User talk:DannyJC13|talk]]) 15:27, 26 December 2011 (CET) | ||
:Why? So we can clutter that article more? If you ask me, whenever possible, words from [[Coinage]] should have their own articles. This article is big enough to obscure the Coinage-article with too much information, but if it was part of the Coinage-article, we would insist to cut it down for style reasons. So rather than doing that, we grant it its own article. | |||
:Whenever a word can be ''discussed'', it should have its own article. But some of the definitions for the words in Coinage is purely dictionary-like. --'''[[User:Svip|Svip]]'''<sup>[[User talk:Svip|talk]]</sup> 12:29, 27 December 2011 (CET) |
Latest revision as of 13:29, 27 December 2011
Shouldn't this be just put on the Coinage page? DannyJC13 (talk) 15:27, 26 December 2011 (CET)
- Why? So we can clutter that article more? If you ask me, whenever possible, words from Coinage should have their own articles. This article is big enough to obscure the Coinage-article with too much information, but if it was part of the Coinage-article, we would insist to cut it down for style reasons. So rather than doing that, we grant it its own article.
- Whenever a word can be discussed, it should have its own article. But some of the definitions for the words in Coinage is purely dictionary-like. --Sviptalk 12:29, 27 December 2011 (CET)