Difference between revisions of "User talk:Aki"
(→Multiple redirects: new section) |
|||
| Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
::I've started a discussion on [[template talk:Ein|the template talk page]]. Please join in! [[User:Aki|Aki]] 02:12, 5 December 2010 (CET) | ::I've started a discussion on [[template talk:Ein|the template talk page]]. Please join in! [[User:Aki|Aki]] 02:12, 5 December 2010 (CET) | ||
:::Joined in. :) [[User:San Saber|San Saber]] 19:16, 5 December 2010 (CET) | :::Joined in. :) [[User:San Saber|San Saber]] 19:16, 5 December 2010 (CET) | ||
== Multiple redirects == | |||
You recently created [[2851]] which redirects to [[2850s]] which redirects to [[29th century]] which redirects to [[Timeline]]. Why wouldn't you just redirect 2851 to the section of the timeline you want ([[Timeline#2500 — 2899]], the pound will bring a person to a section of a page)? I don't know if there is a set policy around here (feel free to enlighten me if there is!), but in my experience , double redirects are generally frowned on because they aren't helpful. Redirects will only direct once. Double redirects are always found at [[Special:DoubleRedirects]]. —'''[[User:JediRogue|Jedi<font color=red>♥</font>Rogue]]''' 02:55, 29 December 2010 (CET) | |||
Revision as of 03:55, 29 December 2010
So this is my talk page. Leave a message if you want something.
Beep
I'm not getting good reception on your talk page. Call me back on my shellphone! (AGAIN.) San Saber 23:43, 5 October 2010 (CEST)
13 episodes a season
http://ifmagazine.com/feature.asp?article=3955 In the eyes of DXC, the 26 ep production season is two 13 ep broadcast seasons. "Season 7" is consists of all 13 episodes from 2010 and "Season 8" is 13 episodes that will be shown in 2011. The DVDs will follow the 2010/2011 divide. As a result I undid your edit to Resurrection. I hope you understand Thegreyanomaly 03:44, 6 October 2010 (CEST)
(6ACV13)
Hi, Aki. Just noticed you've been replacing the (Production Code) thingies with the "ein" template. I know it's kind of our standard, but it looks terrible, while the other one's actually pretty eye-pleasing... at least, the way I see it. (And that's what we want, right? The readers should be happy with the pages they're reading.) I was wondering if you were gonna start changing articles so they'll all use the template. If so: Please, don't! San Saber 01:16, 5 December 2010 (CET)
- As you say it is our standard. If it is bad then the standard must be changed. In my opinion the ein template should continue, but be changed into something more eyepleasing. I'll work on it, and while I do, please don't change any of the templates. Aki 01:59, 5 December 2010 (CET)
- I've started a discussion on the template talk page. Please join in! Aki 02:12, 5 December 2010 (CET)
- Joined in. :) San Saber 19:16, 5 December 2010 (CET)
- I've started a discussion on the template talk page. Please join in! Aki 02:12, 5 December 2010 (CET)
Multiple redirects
You recently created 2851 which redirects to 2850s which redirects to 29th century which redirects to Timeline. Why wouldn't you just redirect 2851 to the section of the timeline you want (Timeline#2500 — 2899, the pound will bring a person to a section of a page)? I don't know if there is a set policy around here (feel free to enlighten me if there is!), but in my experience , double redirects are generally frowned on because they aren't helpful. Redirects will only direct once. Double redirects are always found at Special:DoubleRedirects. —Jedi♥Rogue 02:55, 29 December 2010 (CET)