Difference between revisions of "Talk:Timeline"

From The Infosphere, the Futurama Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(→‎Ep-refs?: new section)
Line 11: Line 11:


I think these items need ep-refs. Obviously the smallest kind we have, so as not to clutter the place up. But it really really needs it. --[[User:Buddy13|Buddy]] 21:37, 5 April 2009 (UTC)
I think these items need ep-refs. Obviously the smallest kind we have, so as not to clutter the place up. But it really really needs it. --[[User:Buddy13|Buddy]] 21:37, 5 April 2009 (UTC)
:This is a good idea to bring up a standard again for an inline reference to episodes.  Something I have brought up before, mind you.  Such a standard could easily work in this case as well.  The concept was pretty straight forward, e.g.<sup>[[Space Pilot 3000|1ACV01]] [[Image:Episodeicon.png|10px|Episode]]</sup>.  That would give the illusion of two things that we intend; a, it is a reference to an episode/film/whatever and b, it is inline and slightly subtle. --'''[[User:Svip|Svip]]'''<sup>[[User talk:Svip|Talk]]</sup> 00:29, 6 April 2009 (UTC)

Revision as of 01:29, 6 April 2009

Fry's nephew

Note: Discussion moved to Talk:Philip J. Fry, II#Age

Year articles for "big" years

There are some years that could do with its own article, such as 3000, 3001, etc. But also 2000 and 1999 and thereabouts. Minor periods will of course remain in this article, but the "big years" will be split into their own article.

This is only a suggestion, however, I don't know how many of you want to expand this out in minor articles, cause this one is getting big. --SvipTalk 20:15, 21 March 2009 (UTC)

Ep-refs?

I think these items need ep-refs. Obviously the smallest kind we have, so as not to clutter the place up. But it really really needs it. --Buddy 21:37, 5 April 2009 (UTC)

This is a good idea to bring up a standard again for an inline reference to episodes. Something I have brought up before, mind you. Such a standard could easily work in this case as well. The concept was pretty straight forward, e.g.1ACV01 Episode. That would give the illusion of two things that we intend; a, it is a reference to an episode/film/whatever and b, it is inline and slightly subtle. --SvipTalk 00:29, 6 April 2009 (UTC)