Difference between revisions of "Talk:Season 6"

From The Infosphere, the Futurama Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(→‎New source: new section)
Line 6: Line 6:


since i'm no good at referencing and the like, here's an article with heaps of new information. hope you use it. [http://popwatch.ew.com/2010/05/25/futurama-david-x-cohen-preview/] --[[User:Scruffy|I'm Scruffy... the Janitor.]] 00:04, 26 May 2010 (CEST)
since i'm no good at referencing and the like, here's an article with heaps of new information. hope you use it. [http://popwatch.ew.com/2010/05/25/futurama-david-x-cohen-preview/] --[[User:Scruffy|I'm Scruffy... the Janitor.]] 00:04, 26 May 2010 (CEST)
:I will, I just need to read it first.  Unfortunately, I pretty much caught up in a lot of unrelated work this week, so I don't really have much time, but I will make it a priority during whatever free time I have.  But I apologise for not keeping this article up to date. --'''[[User:Svip|Svip]]'''<sup>[[User talk:Svip|talk]]</sup> 01:06, 26 May 2010 (CEST)

Revision as of 00:06, 26 May 2010

Recasting ploy article

A lot of people are talking, hell, more than usual, and I think the recasting thing is becoming so big, that it deserves its own article. With timelines, backgrounds, each side of the story and all that regular stuff. My only problem is simple. What to call the article? What is a good title that captures the essential? I don't want the title to imply they are actually recasting or that it is a tactic. But I suppose the latter will be a more fitting, as it is true. What you think of "20th Century Fox Television's Futurama recasting ploy" (if it happens again, we can just slap "2009" onto it) or "2009 recasting ploy" or is "ploy" even a good word? --SvipTalk 16:11, 27 July 2009 (UTC)

New source

since i'm no good at referencing and the like, here's an article with heaps of new information. hope you use it. [1] --I'm Scruffy... the Janitor. 00:04, 26 May 2010 (CEST)

I will, I just need to read it first. Unfortunately, I pretty much caught up in a lot of unrelated work this week, so I don't really have much time, but I will make it a priority during whatever free time I have. But I apologise for not keeping this article up to date. --Sviptalk 01:06, 26 May 2010 (CEST)