Difference between revisions of "Talk:Rebirth"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
The {{w|Rebirth (Futurama)|wikipedia article}} mentions the "{{w|Frederator Studios}}". Do you know about that? {{User:TheFry/sig}}20:10, 4 March 2010 (CET) | The {{w|Rebirth (Futurama)|wikipedia article}} mentions the "{{w|Frederator Studios}}". Do you know about that? {{User:TheFry/sig}}20:10, 4 March 2010 (CET) | ||
:Going through the revision history of the article, I can see it [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Rebirth_%28Futurama%29&diff=prev&oldid=346959712 has been added by an IP editor]. But if you try read the sentence, you will realise that it makes no sense. Since this is clearly unsourced, and I have been keeping taps on all sources related to the new ''Futurama'', as have my friends over at [[PEEL]] and [[FMMB]], so my assumption this is bull, at which point I will also remove it from the Wikipedia article. --'''[[User:Svip|Svip]]'''<sup>[[User talk:Svip|talk]]</sup> 20:41, 4 March 2010 (CET) | :Going through the revision history of the article, I can see it [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Rebirth_%28Futurama%29&diff=prev&oldid=346959712 has been added by an IP editor]. But if you try read the sentence, you will realise that it makes no sense. Since this is clearly unsourced, and I have been keeping taps on all sources related to the new ''Futurama'', as have my friends over at [[PEEL]] and [[FMMB]], so my assumption this is bull, at which point I will also remove it from the Wikipedia article. --'''[[User:Svip|Svip]]'''<sup>[[User talk:Svip|talk]]</sup> 20:41, 4 March 2010 (CET) | ||
::I suspected it was a fake. {{User:TheFry/sig}}23:03, 4 March 2010 (CET) | |||
Revision as of 00:03, 5 March 2010
Frederator Studios
The wikipedia article mentions the "Frederator Studios". Do you know about that? — TheFry20:10, 4 March 2010 (CET)
- Going through the revision history of the article, I can see it has been added by an IP editor. But if you try read the sentence, you will realise that it makes no sense. Since this is clearly unsourced, and I have been keeping taps on all sources related to the new Futurama, as have my friends over at PEEL and FMMB, so my assumption this is bull, at which point I will also remove it from the Wikipedia article. --Sviptalk 20:41, 4 March 2010 (CET)
- I suspected it was a fake. — TheFry23:03, 4 March 2010 (CET)