Talk:Miscellany of Bender's Game

Necessary?

Is the "lesbian fetish" point necessary? Isn't that more of a personal thing than general trivia?-- the preceding unsigned comment was written by Mine-Me.

I agree, I felt too it was a little over the top. Not because I am going to censor "bad words" (as I don't believe in censorship), but because it seems like a rather speculative and subjective thing. My thought was that the writers just wanted her seducing to take a step further, for the comedy value of it, rather than satisfying anything one sexually. In addition, to those of the fans who wanted it are probably a minority. But I doubt it was the writers' intend to satisfy them, and it is more a comedy feature. You know, humour! --Svip^Talk 20:58, 5 November 2008 (UTC)

I believe it was Anarchy Balsac who put it up. We'll wait for his thoughts first I guess. Another wonder I had was the rumour point. I see how it's relevant, but I also don't think it is relevant (if that makes sense). -Mini-Me 22:22, 5 November 2008 (UTC)

It was the only way I could think of to describe it. Not all straight men think lesbians are attractive, so it is important to draw a distinction. As for the speculation part, well any explanation of it is speculative, however, my theory is heavily supported by the commentary where one of the commentators said, "Your welcome fans" during that very part.Anarchy Balsac 06:11, 6 November 2008 (UTC)