Difference between revisions of "Talk:Melllvar"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m (→Melllvar's Age: You're right.) |
m |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
Should we note that his age is probably in Omega 3 years, and not earth years? It would make more sense because, among other reasons, it wouldn't contradict him giving the Star Trek cast eternally young bodies over a century before the Planet Express crew arrived.[[User:Anarchy Balsac|Anarchy Balsac]] 08:18, 20 March 2008 (PDT) | Should we note that his age is probably in Omega 3 years, and not earth years? It would make more sense because, among other reasons, it wouldn't contradict him giving the Star Trek cast eternally young bodies over a century before the Planet Express crew arrived.[[User:Anarchy Balsac|Anarchy Balsac]] 08:18, 20 March 2008 (PDT) | ||
:True... which is specifically why I did not choose to add "years", but people may assume it would be "Earth years" rather than something else. But hey, you add "34 complete full orbits of Omega 3" that should clarify it. *giggles* --'''[[User:Svip|Svip]]'''<sup>[[User talk:Svip|Talk]]</sup> 08:21, 20 March 2008 (PDT) | :True... which is specifically why I did not choose to add "years", but people may assume it would be "Earth years" rather than something else. But hey, you add "34 complete full orbits of Omega 3" that should clarify it. *giggles* --'''[[User:Svip|Svip]]'''<sup>[[User talk:Svip|Talk]]</sup> 08:21, 20 March 2008 (PDT) | ||
:Yeah, I'll just put "omega 3 years" in parenthesis, they'll understand that.[[User:Anarchy Balsac|Anarchy Balsac]] 08:25, 20 March 2008 (PDT) | |||
Latest revision as of 17:25, 20 March 2008
Melllvar's Age
Should we note that his age is probably in Omega 3 years, and not earth years? It would make more sense because, among other reasons, it wouldn't contradict him giving the Star Trek cast eternally young bodies over a century before the Planet Express crew arrived.Anarchy Balsac 08:18, 20 March 2008 (PDT)
- True... which is specifically why I did not choose to add "years", but people may assume it would be "Earth years" rather than something else. But hey, you add "34 complete full orbits of Omega 3" that should clarify it. *giggles* --SvipTalk 08:21, 20 March 2008 (PDT)
- Yeah, I'll just put "omega 3 years" in parenthesis, they'll understand that.Anarchy Balsac 08:25, 20 March 2008 (PDT)