Difference between revisions of "New New York v. Santa Bender"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m |
|||
Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
|location = [[New New York Court]] | |location = [[New New York Court]] | ||
|judge = [[Judge Whitey]] | |judge = [[Judge Whitey]] | ||
|accused | |accused = Robot Santa Claus (actually Bender Bending Rodríguez) | ||
|charged for = "Crimes" against humanity | |||
|verdict = Sentenced to be executed at sundown | |verdict = Sentenced to be executed at sundown | ||
|appearance = {{elink|3ACV03|A Tale of Two Santas}} | |appearance = {{elink|3ACV03|A Tale of Two Santas}} |
Revision as of 20:59, 25 January 2010
New New York v. Santa Bender | |
---|---|
Date | 3002 |
Location | New New York Court |
Judge(s) | Judge Whitey |
Defendant | Robot Santa Claus (actually Bender Bending Rodríguez) |
Charged for | "Crimes" against humanity |
Verdict | Sentenced to be executed at sundown |
Appearance | "A Tale of Two Santas" (3ACV03) |
The New New York v. Santa Bender case was a trial by the New New York Court, with the Honourable Judge Whitey presiding. Being mistaken for the real Santa Claus, Bender is brought before Judge Whitey to be tried for his "crimes" against humanity. Pramala was the witness in the trail. The decision of the judge was that Santa Bender was guilty because "I have a ham dinner with mayonnaise waiting for me at my mansion". Santa Bender was sentenced to be executed at sundown.