Difference between revisions of "Infosphere talk:Featured articles/2011"
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
=== Fortnight 1: Tinny Tim === | === Fortnight 1: Tinny Tim === | ||
[[Tinny Tim]] has been chosen for fortnight 1, 2011. | '''[[Tinny Tim]]''' has been chosen for fortnight 1, 2011. [[User:Aki|Aki]] 16:22, 20 December 2010 (CET) | ||
=== Fortnight 2: The Late Philip J. Fry === | |||
'''[[The Late Philip J. Fry]]''' has been chosen for fortnight 2, 2011. The votes cast were two to zero. [[User:Aki|Aki]] 16:22, 20 December 2010 (CET) | |||
Revision as of 17:22, 20 December 2010
Moving
On January 1, 2011 this article should be moved to Infosphere:Featured articles (that currently redirects to Infosphere:Featured articles/2010). Aki 15:54, 20 December 2010 (CET)
Announcements
When an article has been choosen to be featured (it seems like I'm constantly the one making the decisions, albeit considering the casted votes and accepting eventual critisism), there should be a possibility for anyone to disagree and argue with the decision. As such, this topic in the talk page is to argue with a decision. At any time when a new featured article has been choosen, it should be added as a seperate topic and one can comment. Aki 16:16, 20 December 2010 (CET)
Fortnight 1: Tinny Tim
Tinny Tim has been chosen for fortnight 1, 2011. Aki 16:22, 20 December 2010 (CET)
Fortnight 2: The Late Philip J. Fry
The Late Philip J. Fry has been chosen for fortnight 2, 2011. The votes cast were two to zero. Aki 16:22, 20 December 2010 (CET)