Difference between revisions of "Table:1979 articles"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Created page.) |
|||
(5 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
== What the hell?! == | == What the hell?! == | ||
I know this isn't a big deal, but I've just noticed we have '''1979 articles'''! How's that even possible? We had over 2000 articles a few hours ago. Did I miss anything? I mean, I'm ''weirded out''! (Well, not really...) [[User:San Saber|San Saber]] 01:11, 21 December 2010 (CET) | I know this isn't a big deal, but I've just noticed we have '''1979 articles'''! How's that even possible? We had over 2000 articles a few hours ago. Did I miss anything? I mean, I'm ''weirded out''! (Well, not really...) [[User:San Saber|San Saber]] 01:11, 21 December 2010 (CET) | ||
:[[Largest gold nugget in the world|1980 articles]]. I don't feel so bad anymore... [[User:San Saber|San Saber]] 02:18, 21 December 2010 (CET) | |||
::[[Special:Statistics]]; Content pages = 1,984. Pages (All pages in the wiki, including talk pages, redirects, etc.) = 10,500. Someone recently converted a bunch of year article stubs that needn't have existed into redirects. They had no value, but had enough characters to count as a content page using MediaWiki's formula. - [[User:Quolnok|Quolnok]] 00:30, 22 December 2010 (CET) | |||
:::Did you forget already, Saber? When you add up all the stubs we redirected, it makes sense that the number dropped. [[User:Teyrn of Highever|Teyrn of Highever]] 01:03, 22 December 2010 (CET) | |||
::::God, what a noob! I can't believe I forgot about those. Sorry, everybody. (I knew that, Quolnok. There's just something wrong with me lately. Maybe I'm not getting enough sleep?) [[User:San Saber|San Saber]] 14:25, 22 December 2010 (CET) | |||
:::::In your defense, you couldn't really call those stubs content. [[User:Teyrn of Highever|Teyrn of Highever]] 14:35, 22 December 2010 (CET) | |||
::::::LOL. Yeah. They were more stupid than me, apparently. [[User:San Saber|San Saber]] 14:55, 22 December 2010 (CET) |
Latest revision as of 15:55, 22 December 2010
What the hell?!
I know this isn't a big deal, but I've just noticed we have 1979 articles! How's that even possible? We had over 2000 articles a few hours ago. Did I miss anything? I mean, I'm weirded out! (Well, not really...) San Saber 01:11, 21 December 2010 (CET)
- 1980 articles. I don't feel so bad anymore... San Saber 02:18, 21 December 2010 (CET)
- Special:Statistics; Content pages = 1,984. Pages (All pages in the wiki, including talk pages, redirects, etc.) = 10,500. Someone recently converted a bunch of year article stubs that needn't have existed into redirects. They had no value, but had enough characters to count as a content page using MediaWiki's formula. - Quolnok 00:30, 22 December 2010 (CET)
- Did you forget already, Saber? When you add up all the stubs we redirected, it makes sense that the number dropped. Teyrn of Highever 01:03, 22 December 2010 (CET)
- God, what a noob! I can't believe I forgot about those. Sorry, everybody. (I knew that, Quolnok. There's just something wrong with me lately. Maybe I'm not getting enough sleep?) San Saber 14:25, 22 December 2010 (CET)
- In your defense, you couldn't really call those stubs content. Teyrn of Highever 14:35, 22 December 2010 (CET)
- LOL. Yeah. They were more stupid than me, apparently. San Saber 14:55, 22 December 2010 (CET)
- In your defense, you couldn't really call those stubs content. Teyrn of Highever 14:35, 22 December 2010 (CET)
- God, what a noob! I can't believe I forgot about those. Sorry, everybody. (I knew that, Quolnok. There's just something wrong with me lately. Maybe I'm not getting enough sleep?) San Saber 14:25, 22 December 2010 (CET)
- Did you forget already, Saber? When you add up all the stubs we redirected, it makes sense that the number dropped. Teyrn of Highever 01:03, 22 December 2010 (CET)
- Special:Statistics; Content pages = 1,984. Pages (All pages in the wiki, including talk pages, redirects, etc.) = 10,500. Someone recently converted a bunch of year article stubs that needn't have existed into redirects. They had no value, but had enough characters to count as a content page using MediaWiki's formula. - Quolnok 00:30, 22 December 2010 (CET)