User talk:Sanfazer

From The Infosphere, the Futurama Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Message-box notice.png
This user is on wiki vacation.
He/she (we don't know) will be back on {{CURRENTDAY}}^2.

Who is that fellow? What is he doing?
Oh, dear! I really oughta do something!
But I am already in my pajamas.

Let's see how crazy I am now, Nixon!
The correct answer is "very".
[Zoidberg sees a link.]

Zoidberg: What's this?

Locations in "Simpsorama"

Because I already know you're gonna ask, we deduced that the location in the "Simpsorama" screenshot released yesterday is set in Professor Frink's lab here (notice the corner at the back is identical to the one in the "Simpsorama" image). DannyJC13 (talk) 22:34, 5 September 2014 (CEST)

Oh. Okay. So I *won't* ask.
Good job. Sanfazer: [talk] 22:44, 5 September 2014 (CEST).
I think it's a given we can add Springfield to that list, then? DannyJC13 (talk) 22:48, 5 September 2014 (CEST)
Is *the lab* in Springfield? If so, yes. If not, I think we shouldn't. Simply because there is no evidence of Springfield being a location in the promos/information released so far. (Although of course Springfield will appear. (I'm betting 10 Futurama euros. Professor Land fun bucks.)) I'm going to remove Springfield from the list; if someone confirms that the lab is located there, it should be put back in. Sanfazer: [talk] 23:52, 5 September 2014 (CEST).
What are Professor Land Fun Bucks? LunchTime123 11:09, 15 August 2015 (CEST) (timestamp added by Sanfazer (talk))
[1] Sanfazer: [talk] 23:06, 15 August 2015 (CEST).


How is the change that (me) made wrong? It's more compact. Nalexa (talk) 17:11, 1 October 2014 (CEST)

Yes. It is. But there's no need for it. So it shouldn't have been made. Sanfazer: [talk] 18:54, 1 October 2014 (CEST).
But why use a harder version? 01:18, 2 October 2014 (CEST)
Because using an easier version doesn't change anything. Sanfazer: [talk] 12:34, 2 October 2014 (CEST).
If it changes nothing, then why use the harder one? BTW, what is the policy for becoming sysop on this wiki? Is it invitation, do you request it, are there elections. I'd like to become one (I know you can't edit user rights, just wondering) because I may be more active if I can bypass the CAPTCHA. Nalexa (talk) 04:43, 3 October 2014 (CEST)
So people won't make any more changes that change nothing.
You can ask Svip. Sanfazer: [talk] 13:20, 3 October 2014 (CEST).

Wikisimpsons links

Hi, I've noticed links to Wikisimpsons are still showing up as We moved to a while ago, so I was wondering whether you'd be able to update the link to point there instead. Doesn't make much of a difference since the old .net URL redirects there anyway, but it'd be better to not have the redirection. Thanks, ☆The Solar Dragon☆ 14:09, 12 October 2014 (CEST)

I'm afraid not. Only Svip is. You'll have to ask him again. Sanfazer: [talk] 21:46, 12 October 2014 (CEST).

This is important enough to cut your vacation

Block this spam IP please, tho check out the response I left :P [2] Nalexa (talk) 03:13, 18 April 2015 (CEST)

Thanks. Diarrhea has been a "common occurrence" on this wiki, lately.
[3] Sanfazer: [talk] 15:42, 18 April 2015 (CEST).
I am a sysop on another wiki and will cheerfully pwn a spammer anytime you ask me too :) Nalexa (talk) 03:23, 19 April 2015 (CEST)
Good to know.
I would suggest a page for listing users that should be blocked. (Along with the edit or edits they should be blocked for.) Sanfazer: [talk] 14:14, 19 April 2015 (CEST).

I'm sorry if you didn't understand me

I couldn't move the page, so I copied it. And pages always have the most we know about character's names. such as Bender Bending Rodriguez. So if her name is Carol, that's what we should use. Nalexa (talk) 19:04, 3 May 2015 (CEST)

If you couldn't move it, you should have requested that it be moved.
No. See my explanation. (And this.) Sanfazer: [talk] 20:06, 3 May 2015 (CEST).
Ah, 2007: The Infosphere was still an infant, everyone was excited about the upcoming movies, I lived with my parents, had practically no money and was about to finish uni, we were optimistic about Rudd and I think there was a war on, something to do with... sandwiches? - Quolnok (talk) 17:47, 4 May 2015 (CEST)
For me it was the year that Jennifer Lopez "sang" a song in Spanish for the ceremony of the announcement of the new seven wonders of the known universe in a country that many people still know as the land of Cristiano Ronaldo. Even if he was born on an off-shore island. (That's *my* country, for those that haven't seen my user page. I feel I should mention that, because in my opinion people will be better off knowing. (The country's name is Portugal, in case anyone is still doing m*a*th to figure it out. It's on Wikipedia. (But the "T" ain't pronounced like a "T". Be prepared for that.))) Sanfazer: [talk] 22:40, 4 May 2015 (CEST).


Please, just explain to me what you want on the page. Nalexa (talk) 01:58, 24 May 2015 (CEST)

What is it that you don't understand? The example is there for a reason. Sanfazer: [talk] 15:36, 24 May 2015 (CEST).
You want it to say something like, if I was asking to block you, like [1] Nalexa (talk) 17:39, 24 May 2015 (CEST) <--- that right there? Nalexa (talk) 17:39, 24 May 2015 (CEST)
I'm sorry. I find this unbelievable. *This* is what I want it to say. Sanfazer: [talk] 23:56, 25 May 2015 (CEST).

Once you've read this message.....

.....delete the revision containing it. Block the IP range 172.56.8.*** . Go go go go go!!! Nalexa (talk) 02:08, 26 May 2015 (CEST)

I don't know if we wanna do that. But even if we did that's out of my reach. Talk to the Lord of All Creation. I mean...; "the Lord of All Stewardship". *Buddy* is the Lord of All Creation. [1] (I'm the Lord of Peanuts.) Sanfazer: [talk] 17:24, 26 May 2015 (CEST).
I'm deleting the original message so the vandal doesn't find it. Please remove the revision containing it. Nalexa (talk) 01:14, 27 May 2015 (CEST)
There is no need for any of that. Sanfazer: [talk] 20:40, 27 May 2015 (CEST).
But there is. I am quite sure he is looking at RC, and I don't want him to discover it. Nalexa (talk) 02:24, 28 May 2015 (CEST)
That doesn't matter. And deleting a message wouldn't stop them from reading anything, because they might have read it beforehand. Sanfazer: [talk] 00:16, 29 May 2015 (CEST).
Fine, don't. But I'm keeping it out of the history, just in case. Nalexa (talk) 01:18, 29 May 2015 (CEST)
No. I've just explained this to you. Sanfazer: [talk] 23:56, 29 May 2015 (CEST).


You're right because Fry said "everyone I ever knew is dead" Although he didn't notice his bike was gone until 1000 years later, it still counts. Nalexa (talk) 08:44, 30 May 2015 (CEST)

That's not really the reason.
I don't understand your bike point. Sanfazer: [talk] 23:12, 30 May 2015 (CEST).
Fry didn't actually notice his bike was gone in the actual episode, dumb-dumb. LunchTime123 18:22, 18 August 2015‎ (CEST) (timestamp added by Sanfazer (talk))
I never said otherwise! *cries* Sanfazer: [talk] 23:08, 18 August 2015 (CEST).
No, not you. I was talking to Nalexa. LunchTime123 08:15, 19 August 2015 (CEST) (timestamp added by Sanfazer (talk))
I'm pretty sure he said "Hey, someone stole my bike" on the way out. Nalexa (talk) 16:19, 19 August 2015 (CEST)
Our survey says...EH-EH! WRONG!!! He said that in the animatic, he never said it in the actual episode in either the original or syndicated airings. LunchTime123 17:35, 19 August 2015 ‎(CEST) (timestamp added by Sanfazer (talk))
Then why were you looking at me when you said that? :( Sanfazer: [talk] 23:06, 19 August 2015 (CEST).
I didn't mean to! *cries* LunchTime123 09:24, 20 August 2015‎ ‎(CEST) (timestamp added by Sanfazer (talk))
Thankfully this is the internet. Sanfazer: [talk] 23:04, 20 August 2015 (CEST).

Oh! I see.

If there is more than one edit in question, the contributions page is listed.Nalexa (talk) 00:55, 31 May 2015 (CEST)

Yes. Shove him in the tube. It was my idea.
Where did I hear that before? Could it've been in a cartoon? No; that's impossible; *I don't watch* cartoons. I merely edit a cartoon wiki based on live-action adaptations of those cartoons that haven't been released for anyone but me. And they're pretty great. (They could do with a little "animation", though. Whatever that is.) Sanfazer: [talk] 01:44, 1 June 2015 (CEST).
Are you being sarcastic, dude? LunchTime123 17:26, 13 August 2015 (CEST) (timestamp added by Sanfazer (talk))
Slightly. :) Sanfazer: [talk] 23:16, 13 August 2015 (CEST).

I need private discussion (removed by poster; restored by pre-nostalgic sentimentalist (who're you lookin' at?))

Would you mind giving me your email? I can't find the feature ANYWHERE! Nalexa (talk) 03:31, 31 May 2015 (CEST)

As the newest bureaucrat

Would you like to execute the thing on User_talk:Svip for me? Nalexa (talk) 03:49, 1 June 2015 (CEST)

Svip said he would leave whether to let me confirm accounts to you (Seriously, right now, my bot outranks me!!) Nalexa (talk) 23:56, 1 June 2015 (CEST)
But I'm only 50% sure I need to because you now can as well. Nalexa (talk) 23:56, 1 June 2015 (CEST)
I've already said I'd confirm the accounts.
My reply to Svip. Sanfazer: [talk] 02:32, 2 June 2015 (CEST).
KK. bot outranks me. Nalexa (talk) 03:45, 2 June 2015 (CEST)
And? Sanfazer: [talk] 23:08, 2 June 2015 (CEST).
And that's really stupid!! Bender (talk) 04:51, 3 June 2015 (CEST)
I think you're forgetting our motto. Sanfazer: [talk] 23:54, 3 June 2015 (CEST).
Bender the character is not bender the user but whatever. Nalexa (talk) 21:22, 28 June 2015 (CEST)
</it's funny because> Sanfazer: [talk] 23:39, 28 June 2015 (CEST).

And another thing

I need some XML files imported into User:Bender Nalexa (talk) 12:23, 1 June 2015 (CEST)

I'm not the guy to ask. Sorry. Sanfazer: [talk] 02:32, 2 June 2015 (CEST).

Help me.....

I signed in as Bender so I could change my password (as I am leaving, and this account has the power to delete the main page!) but the Special:Preferences bug is happening again. This is kinda urgent, but I don't want this account demoted because then I'll have to wait forever when I come back. Bender (talk) 04:51, 3 June 2015 (CEST)

Why would Bender have to change his password? I don't understand. (Is someone out to get him?) Sanfazer: [talk] 23:54, 3 June 2015 (CEST).

Weve got big problems

We need to find a way to change my password, NOW!! I accidentally signed on to a computer to say I felt bad about the vandalism while I was gone, but the computer was KEYLOGGED! And my nalexa password is same one as bender! Nalexa (talk) 21:19, 28 June 2015 (CEST)

Blocked Bender.
Tell Svip. (If Svip's not able to change your password, I would recommend creating a new bot.) Sanfazer: [talk] 23:39, 28 June 2015 (CEST).
I fixed it. Nalexa (talk) 06:33, 21 August 2015 (CEST)
How? Sanfazer: [talk] 23:06, 21 August 2015 (CEST).

Please go to MediaWiki:confirmaccount-welc and set the message to the one you use for ips

Nalexa (talk) 02:39, 2 July 2015 (CEST)

Let me think about this. Sanfazer: [talk] 00:44, 3 July 2015 (CEST).
Done. Sanfazer: [talk] 00:32, 4 July 2015 (CEST).


The same guy is doing it on Wikipedia too. Hm..... Nalexa (talk) 06:22, 14 July 2015 (CEST)

He has a craving. Sanfazer: [talk] 23:08, 14 July 2015 (CEST).

Links to Wikisimpsons

Hi. I'm Loco87, an admin in Wikisimpsons and also a huge Futurama fan. I've noticed that the links to wikisimpsons don't work because they link to "". They should be changed to link to "". The ".net" used to redirect to the ".com" during some time after the move (from net to com), but now it doesn't redirect, so the links should be changed. Thanks! / Loco87 (TALK / Contribs) 13:01, 22 July 2015 (CEST)

I've informed our steward. Thanks for letting me know. Sanfazer: [talk] 21:24, 22 July 2015 (CEST).
Ok. You've all done a great work with this wiki! / Loco87 (TALK / Contribs) 00:07, 23 July 2015 (CEST)
Why thank you! Sanfazer: [talk] 00:32, 24 July 2015 (CEST).

Need an account

Hello Sanfazer. I'm LunchTime123, though I don't have an account on this wiki. I would like to request one, but I'm just too damn nervous! What can I do? -- the preceding unsigned comment was written by

Why are you nervous?
Here's the link to the request form. Sanfazer: [talk] 23:06, 3 August 2015 (CEST).

Hey I kinda object to that :/

The way to resolve edit warring is protecting the page--not blocking them. ESPECIALLY if you're not blocking yourself. Nalexa (talk) 05:29, 10 August 2015 (CEST)

No it's not. Protecting the page would mean less edits just because someone decided to be unreasonable.
"Blocking yourself": I'm not the one making the edit. :) Sanfazer: [talk] 23:08, 10 August 2015 (CEST).

I have a question

Should I create pages about ITV Digital and ITV Select? Sky1, which broadcasts Futurama, is one of the channels on ITV Digital, and ITV Select, the pay-per-view movie service on ITV Digital, has the Futurama films. So, should I? LunchTime123 10:31, 13 August 2015 (CEST) (timestamp added by Sanfazer (talk))

According to Wikipedia, neither has existed since 2002.
Regardless, I don't think so, no. We don't need a page for every service that provides Futurama. We *could* have a page about them, though. (That is...listing them.) Sanfazer: [talk] 23:16, 13 August 2015 (CEST).

Unblock bender

I got it fixed. And I think I was wrong to say that TOS-making user had good intentions. Nalexa (talk) 05:29, 23 August 2015 (CEST)

How did you get it fixed? Sanfazer: [talk] 23:04, 23 August 2015 (CEST).
It turns out it was a WEBPAGE logger, not keylogger. Nalexa (talk) 00:54, 1 September 2015 (CEST)
Unblocked. Sanfazer: [talk] 23:12, 1 September 2015 (CEST).

Did you actually DECODE all that?!?!

The image I gave you in the summary. Did you? :P Nalexa (talk) 04:05, 28 August 2015 (CEST)

No. I have better things to do I'm too lazy. (Why do you ask?) Sanfazer: [talk] 23:04, 28 August 2015 (CEST).
You didn't revert the edit :P -- the preceding unsigned comment was written by Nalexa.
Should I have? Sanfazer: [talk] 23:18, 29 August 2015 (CEST).
No. You just usually do if you don't agree with something or have a reason to agree with it. Nalexa (talk) 06:22, 1 September 2015 (CEST)
True. In theory, everything should have a source (which is the same as saying "a source that backs what it's a source for"), but since this is a small wiki you can expect that whatever change is justified and if it's not that someone who knows it will revert it. Sanfazer: [talk] 23:12, 1 September 2015 (CEST).


Is Linda joking about the windmills? I assumed that she was serious because she does seem ditsy. -- the preceding unsigned comment was written by

That's what it seems like to me. Sanfazer: [talk] 23:04, 29 August 2015 (CEST).

We have a problem

That guy who keeps adding anything to do with diarrhoea or some nonsensical gibberish like that there is back again. [as Professor Farnsworth] Why? WHY?! WHY DIDN'T YOU BAN WHOEVER HE IS FROM THE INFOSPHERE??!! -- the preceding unsigned comment was written by LunchTime123.

Don't look at me! I've been blocking these gentlemen for as long as I can remember! It's just they like this hobby of theirs too much. Believe it or not. And who am I to crush people's hopes for the future? (No pun intended.) Fox? Comedy Central? Calculon's doctor? (I'm pretty sure those are other people, but I could be wrong.) Sanfazer: [talk] 23:08, 30 August 2015 (CEST).
Well, I could be Channel 4, Sky1 or The Queen of England, but you don't see me bragging on about it. -- the preceding unsigned comment was written by LunchTime123.
Yeah. Those are pretty weak people.
Oops. Self laugh. Sanfazer: [talk] 23:04, 31 August 2015 (CEST).
Well, the whole cops-and-robbers thing is probably what he wants. I propose we try leaving them that way for a few weeks and see if he stops. Nalexa (talk) 00:56, 1 September 2015 (CEST)
Who are you? My tennis instructor? -- the preceding unsigned comment was written by LunchTime123.

Yes, I am. Tennis has even a little relevance to this conversation. Nalexa (talk) 18:05, 1 September 2015 (CEST)

I propose we try leaving them that way for a few days and see if they stop. And if not we call the League of Robots. Unless it's a cartoon for babies. Sanfazer: [talk] 23:12, 1 September 2015 (CEST).
I'm sorry but that's a stupid solution. All it'll do is make the IP think "Hahaha. They've finally given up" then he'll probably go about making more edits. There are definitely better solutions. I gave you one below, range blocking. Just block every IP in the ranges the vandal edits from. ☆The Solar Dragon☆ 11:02, 4 September 2015 (CEST)
That wasn't my solution. It was Nalexa's weird suggestion.
No. Because they might be using / start using proxies. Sanfazer: [talk] 23:18, 4 September 2015 (CEST).


It's about deleted pages. For example, I just deleted my user page. I still have the option to create it even when logged out. Nalexa (talk) 23:53, 1 September 2015 (CEST)

You should. At least I think so. Sanfazer: [talk] 23:54, 1 September 2015 (CEST).
No no no. You're not supposed to be able to. But I will recreate anyway. Nalexa (talk) 05:13, 2 September 2015 (CEST)
Are you basing that on anything, or is it your personal opinion? Sanfazer: [talk] 23:04, 2 September 2015 (CEST).
Oh, NVM. On some wikis, once a page has been deleted, you have to be a user to re-create again. Nalexa (talk) 03:05, 4 September 2015 (CEST)
I see. Sanfazer: [talk] 23:18, 4 September 2015 (CEST).

The IP was already banned

^ Nalexa (talk) 03:04, 4 September 2015 (CEST)

Yes. It was. The length of the ban was wrong. Sanfazer: [talk] 23:18, 4 September 2015 (CEST).

Please stop linking to that one edit

My monitor turns red to black, and with the background I have no way of seeing that. I am looking at my own edits but everyone makes mistakes. Nalexa (talk) 04:34, 4 September 2015 (CEST)

I'm sorry, but that's not my problem. :) Perhaps you should find a way to fix it if you plan on continuing editing wikis.
No you are not. Not if you make mistakes like this with such frequency. Sanfazer: [talk] 23:18, 4 September 2015 (CEST).
Try installing this in firefox/chrome. - Quolnok (talk) 11:37, 12 September 2015 (CEST)

Try a range block

Block This should help stop a lot of the vandalism. ☆The Solar Dragon☆ 10:58, 4 September 2015 (CEST)

Done. Can you request accounts while blocked? I included a link because it's a range (and innocent users may be involved) Nalexa (talk) 16:10, 4 September 2015 (CEST)
I don't know as we don't use the request account system at Wikisimpsons. And I can't see what the block user interface is like here. Is there a tick box that says something along the lines of "prevent account creation"? I'm unsure if that also prevents account requesting. You could try blocking your IP and seeing if requesting an account works.
Hopefully this will put a stop to most of it. He might get a new IP range in another location. All you can do is keep range blocking. Eventually he'll run out of places to vandalise from and IPs and it'll stop. I've had to deal with a handful of persistent vandals at Wikisimpsons over the years and range blocking seems to be the best way to stop them. ☆The Solar Dragon☆ 16:42, 4 September 2015 (CEST)
Hello Solar Dragon! Blocking Interface.jpg is what a user sees when blocking people. There is infact a prevent account creation one, but it doesn't matter as account creation is locked either way anyway. Ok, I will try blocking my IP for 20 minutes tho. Nalexa (talk) 17:01, 4 September 2015 (CEST)
It worked! It didn't work on another wiki but that was just a modded version. Nalexa (talk) 17:14, 4 September 2015 (CEST)

Reverted blocks.

You should have waited for an admin's input. You are not an admin. You may not choose who gets blocked. No one gave you free rein on blocks. You may block users that you detect doing vandalism, and I thought that was being done automatically. (= "bot".) Sanfazer: [talk] 23:18, 4 September 2015 (CEST).

Please answer your email.

I've been waiting forever. 17:34, 7 September 2015 (CEST)

Write here.
(I didn't get anything, by the way.) Sanfazer: [talk] 23:04, 7 September 2015 (CEST).
Fine, I will.
I I was, in fact, not "inserting nonsense/gibberish into pages". Technically, you said "I propose leaving them that way for a few days to see if they stop", then something about LOR.
Lake Mutagenic does have an extremely slim chance of improving the rat's appearance. It happened in a deleted scene.
And I am very sorry about trying to create my own solutions, I was just eager to put an end to it. 23:37, 7 September 2015 (CEST)
And one more thing. If you want to unblock me, give me the respect of a user, but DO NOT unblock me. Do we have any ways of contacting the real vandal? (I have a plan) 05:07, 8 September 2015 (CEST)
Yes you were.
Lake Mutagenic is not why you were blocked.
You were eager?
I am not unblocking you.
A plan, you say? Sanfazer: [talk] 23:08, 8 September 2015 (CEST).
OK, here's what I mean. Vandalism is a blatant attempt to disrupt the wiki. Immediate block is a bit of an overreaction when you technically agreed to it (look at the talk page) 23:36, 8 September 2015 (CEST)
I "technically agreed" to have you vandalize pages? You have no credibility. Sanfazer: [talk] 23:04, 9 September 2015 (CEST).
Nalexa always wins! 06:19, 10 September 2015 (CEST)
That's a good reference. I'll give you that.
Wait. I'm not giving you anything. Sanfazer: [talk] 23:04, 10 September 2015 (CEST).
You are kidding, right?
Because if you are not, maybe I really shouldn't work with you. Here's the thing : I am faster both manually and automatically at reverting vandalism than you. So why stick around over this? For example, the pages are all vandalized right now. I *can* revert it but I'm not going to. 04:32, 11 September 2015 (CEST)
We can revert it without you thank you very much. Sanfazer: [talk] 23:04, 11 September 2015 (CEST).
Well, it depends. Are you joking when you are saying "I'm not giving you anything". 02:31, 12 September 2015 (CEST)

I wasn't a fan of Nelexa having blocking capabilities, or blocking by bot in general. I was disappointed that he decided to sign an addition in the main namespace[5]. I was confused by Sanfazer's suggestion to leave the pages vandalised and subsequent denial thereof, perhaps he was quoting an earlier comment from Nalexa? I dug through contribution history and couldn't find it. Then I saw that Nalexa as Bender reverted his bot's vandalism[6]. I'd missed that and thought the bot had malfunctioned on seeing the other reversions by Solar Dragon of the bot account's work. The bot is currently blocked for a year, but I'm considering increasing that to indefinite. Nalexa's block... I wanted to find a reason to reduce it, but I can't. I saw the range block go into place and thought "Yeah, I guess it's about time" - I had considered it back in... March?! Seriously?! ...but at the time it wasn't from just the one IP range and the blocks would have locked out too many innocents. I think the range block should go back up but for some period less than a year, perhaps 3 months - sorry other Americans using TMobile.
Other notes: The only way to contact the vandal is by leaving a note on their talk page, which they are unlikely to see with a dynamic IP on a mobile phone, Special:EmailUser won't work as there's no user account. - Quolnok (talk) 11:41, 12 September 2015 (CEST)

Well, Sanfazer is claiming to not be a fan right now, even though he said "anyone who can be trusted to delete pages can be trusted to do the other stuff". But the part was actually because I was trying to make it look less vandalism-y if I re-did with the account is was reverted in. And that actually won't work, because I need an out-of-wiki way. I need to still be blocked in order for it to work, and the only way I can edit talk pages is to unblock me! I guess we're kind of stuck, and the vandalism will keep going 4ever :/ 16:57, 12 September 2015 (CEST)
Yes. That was a clear joke.
"Sanfazer's suggestion to leave the pages vandalised": I never suggested that. Perhaps if Nalexa had linked a diff as I'm sure he/she can, instead of weirdly linking a print of my post, *no one* would've been confused.
(Fewer and fewer people are using control-"F".)
"Increasing that to indefinite": I agree. (If indefinite means a block of *over* a year.)
"The range block should go back up": I disagree. These people clearly have an agenda and we shouldn't let them harm the wiki. Not by vandalizing it not by getting us to prevent editing.
This vandalism is fine. Wikis get vandalism. It's just it's usually not this suspicious.
"Even though he said": Exactly. But I was referring to people in general. You clearly deserve no trust.
"The only way I can edit talk pages": Don't worry. No one is going to unblock you.
"The vandalism will keep going 4ever :/": I'm assuming that's not a threat. Sanfazer: [talk] 23:38, 12 September 2015 (CEST).
That actually wouldn't have helped, the screenshot comes from here perhaps somewhere else he said it, but this one was definitely you. "Indefinite" is the maximum block available, which doesn't expire automatically. I'm fairly sure it's only one person now, but may have started as a group. Everyone else got bored. This guy changes IPs when his phone looses reception or something. His home and work/school IPs appear to be fixed as I've just reblocked one of those. We've done site wide blocks before in an effort to contain bots, this would be far less disruptive to potential editors. - Quolnok (talk) 03:37, 13 September 2015 (CEST)
Well, that was a terrible joke. And the other things you said make it even worse. It's a good thing we're not going to work together. Goodbye. 06:14, 13 September 2015 (CEST)
"Perhaps somewhere else": No. It's in that section.
"Maximum block available": I know. I meant I didn't want a block of indefinite to mean a return in less than a year.
"Far less disruptive": Yes. I'm just saying it should be avoided to the greatest extent possible.
They're not supposed to. :) Sanfazer: [talk] 23:16, 13 September 2015 (CEST).
Nah, yeah I see it now. Still though, it is often hard to tell if someone is joking online. - Quolnok (talk) 11:20, 14 September 2015 (CEST)
Silence! I concur.
I should *never* be taken seriously. Not even when I say this very sentence. (Although which of the two sentences "this very sentence" refers to I don't even know.) Sanfazer: [talk] 23:08, 14 September 2015 (CEST).
Are you positive you can do it without me? Because the vandal just created an account (but didn't get the password) then vandalized 20 pages with the same IP. 06:44, 25 September 2015 (CEST)

I'm telling you its my wife doing the vandallism. I need that a count so I don't get blocked when she does. -- the preceding unsigned comment was written by

Dude, just fuck off. We know it's you. You don't even have a wife. -- the preceding unsigned comment was written by LunchTime123.
Yes. Yes I am. :)
The vandal, now?
This is funnier than freaking Futurama. I'm considering quitting this damn wiki and going all "Godfellas". (So much for the Infosphere wiki. I thought it was a pretty good wiki, but...)
Reverting this vandalism is feeling better and better. (There's just other things I'd like to do instead.)
(Just so "all of" you know, I wrote this after seeing only Person #1's post. So if you think you've got talk...come at me, bro. :) (But you've got nothing, don't you? :) (You try pretty hard, though.))) Sanfazer: [talk] 23:22, 25 September 2015 (CEST).

Outdenting. LunchTime, I will say that that was kind of harsh (even though I think Sanfazer was wrong to block you for it. However, husband of the alleged "vandal", I would like to point out that your "wife" started vandalizing pages 2 minutes after you posted that on the conference table. I am very sorry, but that's kind of suspicious. And what even more is that those are cell phone IPs and you probably don't share the same phone. 02:30, 26 September 2015 (CEST)

""Block" you for it": I blocked him for something else.
"Started vandalizing pages": Yes. We all saw it. And that means you would too.
"That's kind of suspicious": Yes. He seems like a troll, doesn't he?
I would like to see you keep this up if only because it will make my talk page longer. But to be honest I'm pretty tired of talk pages and especially of you. Sanfazer: [talk] 23:06, 26 September 2015 (CEST).
Please don't say you are tired of a person---it doesn't make a website friendly in my experience :( 04:10, 29 September 2015 (CEST)
I am not a website. :) Sanfazer: [talk] 23:16, 29 September 2015 (CEST).
OK, based on the vandal's new conference table post, he obviously wants you to stop him. 05:28, 8 October 2015 (CEST)
Actually, I'm gonna try the "I'm banned too let's work together" card. But you'll have to block my IP and then I won't be able to try my other scheme. Should we go for it? 05:30, 8 October 2015 (CEST)
I told him I will start doing it too so I can try to get dirt on him. I guess I'll be blocked on my IP too but what the hell. (BTW, I told him I will vandalize too but I won't be) 05:38, 8 October 2015 (CEST)
Damn, he's ignoring me. 05:45, 8 October 2015 (CEST)
That plan was never going to work. Neither was blocking individual IPs. I'm sick of seeing this place used as a toilet and I don't think Sanfazer is coping with it as well as he thinks he is, but I'm no psychiatrist. I'm not the suppository of all wisdom, but a suppository sounds like a good way to stop diarrhoea. Two range blocks are now in place on the favoured T Mobile IP ranges with more going up in the next few days if needed. - Quolnok (talk) 15:27, 8 October 2015 (CEST)
Blocking individual IPs was, I guess, a temporary solution before we found out how easy it is for him to come back from a new IP. 16:30, 8 October 2015 (CEST)
The only kind of crawling I'm doing to you is away. From. Sanfazer: [talk] 23:26, 8 October 2015 (CEST).
We just had our first non-diarrea vandalism in a while. 05:25, 23 October 2015 (CEST)
Where? Sanfazer: [talk] 23:08, 23 October 2015 (CEST).
On "Human horn" and another page. Quolnok took care of it. 01:53, 24 October 2015 (CEST)
*There are* other things. Sanfazer: [talk] 23:02, 24 October 2015 (CEST).

I need help

I improved the censorship page, but I'm worried that it hasn't turned out quite as well as I expected. Is that a problem? -- the preceding unsigned comment was written by LunchTime123.

I added a cleanup tag. Sanfazer: [talk] 23:48, 12 September 2015 (CEST).

Our problems have been solved!!

The reason you blocked me was Bender-related. The reason we had problems with Bender was that it was semi-automated (a one-click revert-block tool). Well, guess what, I found out how to make it so that the second you make the edit, it is disallowed and block you. It's time to kick it up a notch. If you willing to unblock me (you can leave bender blocked though, I won't need it anymore) then are you willing to hear my idea? 05:13, 13 January 2016 (CET)

What the hell?! That's not my IP.... 05:13, 13 January 2016 (CET)
I'm not. Sanfazer: [talk] 22:04, 13 January 2016 (CET).
Not what? 01:22, 14 January 2016 (CET)
Not unblocking me? Maybe you should at least hear my idea. It would save you an awful lot of time... 05:58, 14 January 2016 (CET)
No inclination. Sanfazer: [talk] 22:02, 14 January 2016 (CET).
You seriously said yourself that you've been dealing with him for as long as you can remember. Are you sure unblocking me is too large a price to pay to make the real vandal go away forever? 03:55, 15 January 2016 (CET)
Yes. Sanfazer: [talk] 22:02, 15 January 2016 (CET).
Why? You know perfectly well it was not done with intent to cause harm, and besides, it can't hurt to at least hear my idea? Blocks are to prevent someone from doing something---but you know I won't do it again, I won't have to with the problem hopefully already solved. 05:16, 17 January 2016 (CET)
And why was my Nalexa account even blocked? That account did NOTHING. 05:18, 17 January 2016 (CET)
"Why": I don't like you. And I will be ignoring you, until your block expires.
"You know perfectly well": I know few things perfectly well.
"You know I won't do it again": You're right, sentences are not for punishing offenders.
Oh wait, let me laugh even harder. Sanfazer: [talk] 22:14, 17 January 2016 (CET).

Please go easy on my wife

I know it's suspicious that I am writing from a vandals IP, but you must belive me. My wife and I share a phone. (I have a feeling she just vandalized and will continue after I hand the phone back.) Please go easy on her. She just got out of the mental hospital. I know it sounds weird but she needs to be doing this.

Whats Wrong Sanfazer?

You are letting Quonlook take over your job. Are you getting sick of Tina Belcher?

Less Sanfazer to dictate this wiki is a good thing, imo. It can be edited by anyone, not edited by anyone and HEAVILY revised by Sanfazer. DannyJC13 (talk) 22:19, 1 March 2016 (CET)