Difference between revisions of "Template talk:News"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(→Sixth Season?!: new section) |
|||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
I'd add it, but I don't know where to stick the item that falls off the bottom. [http://www.screenjabber.com/futurama_wildgreenyonderDVD It's here.] There are some spoilers, but he claims he's being more careful about that. --[[User:Buddy13|Buddy]] 01:36, 24 December 2008 (UTC) | I'd add it, but I don't know where to stick the item that falls off the bottom. [http://www.screenjabber.com/futurama_wildgreenyonderDVD It's here.] There are some spoilers, but he claims he's being more careful about that. --[[User:Buddy13|Buddy]] 01:36, 24 December 2008 (UTC) | ||
:Uhm, Buddy. That's the exact same review we already have on the news bulletin. Are you drunk? --'''[[User:Svip|Svip]]'''<sup>[[User talk:Svip|Talk]]</sup> 13:45, 24 December 2008 (UTC) | :Uhm, Buddy. That's the exact same review we already have on the news bulletin. Are you drunk? --'''[[User:Svip|Svip]]'''<sup>[[User talk:Svip|Talk]]</sup> 13:45, 24 December 2008 (UTC) | ||
== Sixth Season?! == | |||
[http://www.inquisitr.com/18383/futurama-might-return-to-fox/ Make it news!] | |||
Revision as of 01:49, 27 February 2009
News is more important than new Infosphere pages. Perhaps as old items are dropped, they could be added to a News Archive? Thoughts? --Buddy 15:42, 8 July 2007 (PDT)
- Sounds like a good idea. --SvipTalk 15:58, 8 July 2007 (PDT)
- I don't think anyone will call that a bad idea. I'll go ahead and put the old news into the archive. - Quolnok 17:58, 8 July 2007 (PDT)
Another screenjabber review
I'd add it, but I don't know where to stick the item that falls off the bottom. It's here. There are some spoilers, but he claims he's being more careful about that. --Buddy 01:36, 24 December 2008 (UTC)
- Uhm, Buddy. That's the exact same review we already have on the news bulletin. Are you drunk? --SvipTalk 13:45, 24 December 2008 (UTC)