Difference between revisions of "Template talk:Expansion"

From The Infosphere, the Futurama Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(New page: == Deletion == I was thinking if it was possible to use the {{templink|stub}} template instead of this one. They practically inform of the same thing, only that this one does not even add...)
 
 
(2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
== Deletion ==
== Deletion ==
I was thinking if it was possible to use the {{templink|stub}} template instead of this one.  They practically inform of the same thing, only that this one does not even add the articles to a category.  Therefore I am considering it for deletion to be replaced by the stub template. --'''[[User:Svip|Svip]]'''<sup>[[User talk:Svip|Talk]]</sup> 17:16, 14 April 2008 (PDT)
I was thinking if it was possible to use the {{templink|stub}} template instead of this one.  They practically inform of the same thing, only that this one does not even add the articles to a category.  Therefore I am considering it for deletion to be replaced by the stub template. --'''[[User:Svip|Svip]]'''<sup>[[User talk:Svip|Talk]]</sup> 17:16, 14 April 2008 (PDT)
:Stub - a tiny article
:Expansion - a medium or large article that fails to cover the entire topic.
:I think that was the idea behind it, not sure whether the idea was good, but I can see the intended difference. - [[User:Quolnok|Quolnok]] 18:12, 14 April 2008 (PDT)
::I see your point.  But it would be nice if the expansion template actually included a category.  Besides, the {{templink|stub}} template can also easily be put in a section rather than a whole article.  See?  --'''[[User:Svip|Svip]]'''<sup>[[User talk:Svip|Talk]]</sup> 18:18, 14 April 2008 (PDT)
:::It doesn't bother me much whether you add a category to expansion or replace it, but I do slightly prefer this for sections. - [[User:Quolnok|Quolnok]] 18:35, 14 April 2008 (PDT)

Latest revision as of 03:35, 15 April 2008

Deletion

I was thinking if it was possible to use the {{stub}} template instead of this one. They practically inform of the same thing, only that this one does not even add the articles to a category. Therefore I am considering it for deletion to be replaced by the stub template. --SvipTalk 17:16, 14 April 2008 (PDT)

Stub - a tiny article
Expansion - a medium or large article that fails to cover the entire topic.
I think that was the idea behind it, not sure whether the idea was good, but I can see the intended difference. - Quolnok 18:12, 14 April 2008 (PDT)
I see your point. But it would be nice if the expansion template actually included a category. Besides, the {{stub}} template can also easily be put in a section rather than a whole article. See? --SvipTalk 18:18, 14 April 2008 (PDT)
It doesn't bother me much whether you add a category to expansion or replace it, but I do slightly prefer this for sections. - Quolnok 18:35, 14 April 2008 (PDT)