Difference between revisions of "Talk:Volume 5"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
are you sure this is real? isn't it just [[Futurama: The Collected Epics]]? the link doesn't even work anymore! i'm suggesting a deletion until there is more info on this. --[[User:Scruffy|I'm Scruffy... the Janitor.]] 06:06, 19 October 2009 (UTC) | are you sure this is real? isn't it just [[Futurama: The Collected Epics]]? the link doesn't even work anymore! i'm suggesting a deletion until there is more info on this. --[[User:Scruffy|I'm Scruffy... the Janitor.]] 06:06, 19 October 2009 (UTC) | ||
:Quite probably isn't. We made the article because of what was probably Amazon mistaking broadcast seasons for production/DVD seasons. Although in one of the movie commentaries one of those present wondered aloud if people would buy a episode boxset. - [[User:Quolnok|Quolnok]] 11:08, 19 October 2009 (UTC) | :Quite probably isn't. We made the article because of what was probably Amazon mistaking broadcast seasons for production/DVD seasons. Although in one of the movie commentaries one of those present wondered aloud if people would buy a episode boxset. - [[User:Quolnok|Quolnok]] 11:08, 19 October 2009 (UTC) | ||
::I'd agree that this volume seems less and less likely, but I am not going to rule it out just yet. Maybe the article should reflect its speculative nature. --[[User:Svip|Svip]] 12:32, 19 October 2009 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 14:32, 19 October 2009
are you sure this is real? isn't it just Futurama: The Collected Epics? the link doesn't even work anymore! i'm suggesting a deletion until there is more info on this. --I'm Scruffy... the Janitor. 06:06, 19 October 2009 (UTC)
- Quite probably isn't. We made the article because of what was probably Amazon mistaking broadcast seasons for production/DVD seasons. Although in one of the movie commentaries one of those present wondered aloud if people would buy a episode boxset. - Quolnok 11:08, 19 October 2009 (UTC)
- I'd agree that this volume seems less and less likely, but I am not going to rule it out just yet. Maybe the article should reflect its speculative nature. --Svip 12:32, 19 October 2009 (UTC)