Difference between revisions of "Talk:USS Enterprise"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Created page with '== Is this it? == thumb|right This does not for a moment look like the standard ''Constitution''-class that the ''Enterprise'' is. I don't t...') |
m (→Is this it?) |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
This does not for a moment look like the standard ''Constitution''-class that the ''Enterprise'' is. I don't think this is the ''USS Enterprise'' at all. The ship does deserve an article, but under its rightful name. --'''[[User:Svip|Svip]]'''<sup>[[User talk:Svip|Talk]]</sup> 16:55, 17 May 2009 (UTC) | This does not for a moment look like the standard ''Constitution''-class that the ''Enterprise'' is. I don't think this is the ''USS Enterprise'' at all. The ship does deserve an article, but under its rightful name. --'''[[User:Svip|Svip]]'''<sup>[[User talk:Svip|Talk]]</sup> 16:55, 17 May 2009 (UTC) | ||
:Then maybe we should seperate the articles. I forgot they used that kind of ship. {{User:Chris of the Futurama2/sig}} | |||
Revision as of 18:56, 17 May 2009
Is this it?
This does not for a moment look like the standard Constitution-class that the Enterprise is. I don't think this is the USS Enterprise at all. The ship does deserve an article, but under its rightful name. --SvipTalk 16:55, 17 May 2009 (UTC)
- Then maybe we should seperate the articles. I forgot they used that kind of ship. — Chris of the Futurama 2 [ discuss | contribute ]