Difference between revisions of "Talk:Speculation of Futurama's return until the second run"

From The Infosphere, the Futurama Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 4: Line 4:
==Till -> Until==
==Till -> Until==
Does anyone else prefer "until"? [[Special:Contributions/68.63.95.177|68.63.95.177]] 14:22, 9 June 2010 (CEST)
Does anyone else prefer "until"? [[Special:Contributions/68.63.95.177|68.63.95.177]] 14:22, 9 June 2010 (CEST)
:Eh, I am personally equal for both.  But if there are some decent arguments against 'till', then I might move it.  Personal preference is not an argument in either direction. --'''[[User:Svip|Svip]]'''<sup>[[User talk:Svip|talk]]</sup> 15:41, 9 June 2010 (CEST)

Revision as of 15:41, 9 June 2010

Restructure

I fear this article may need some restructuring. So more intuitive walk through for new readers. Right now, I am just following the append method. I propose someone with fresh eyes to look at it. In addition, I feel the article lacks a section about the consensus was among fans and others during the time before the films and during the films. A picture I gather seems to indicate that most people saw the films as a ramp to a renewal of the show as a TV show. --SvipTalk 22:53, 13 May 2009 (UTC)

Till -> Until

Does anyone else prefer "until"? 68.63.95.177 14:22, 9 June 2010 (CEST)

Eh, I am personally equal for both. But if there are some decent arguments against 'till', then I might move it. Personal preference is not an argument in either direction. --Sviptalk 15:41, 9 June 2010 (CEST)