Difference between revisions of "Talk:Space Pilot 3000"

From The Infosphere, the Futurama Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 29: Line 29:


Ctrl+F and find this phrase in the article. Oddity! Perhaps removal or reworkification? --[[User:Buddy13|Buddy]] 01:12, 6 February 2009 (UTC)
Ctrl+F and find this phrase in the article. Oddity! Perhaps removal or reworkification? --[[User:Buddy13|Buddy]] 01:12, 6 February 2009 (UTC)
:Why? I don't see anything wrong with it. [[User:Futuramadude|Futuramadude]] 01:24, 6 February 2009 (UTC)

Revision as of 02:24, 6 February 2009

Featured.png Space Pilot 3000 appeared on the Infosphere's Main Page as the featured article for Week 11, 2006. This article (or a previous version of it) has been identified as one of the best produced by the Infosphere community. If you can update or improve it, please do.

Eye in the garbage can

Don't add it. Seriously. It's been added and deleted several times from this page. Nibbler's eye doesn't appear in the garbage can until Jurassic Bark. Simple as that. Don't add it.

Flying saucers destroying New York

I added that it was revealed Bender did it the first time in 2308.Anarchy Balsac 18:41, 4 January 2008 (PST)

Man #2

Is it just me or does the guy who says "Pft! Tourist!" after Fry flies out of the tubeline sound a lot like Hank Azaria doing Carl Carlson's voice? I can't find anything to confirm this, but it sounds so much like him. Can anyone confirm this? --dotDarkCloud 17:29, 23 June 2008 (CEST)

Hm, I cannot find any confirmation. There is no credit on this character at all. Neither is it mentioned in the commentary, so my guess would be no. --SvipTalk 17:45, 23 June 2008 (CEST)

Cold opening

An idea I had touched months prior, and am now finally trying it out, I call it the cold opening of an article, similar to those on the show. The idea is that these episode articles start rather "rough", navigation, infobox and plot. No introduction. Sure, straight to the point is nice, but a short introduction, explaining the significances of an episode, a quite recap of its plot and mentions of its guest stars. I am opening this discussion for opinions. --SvipTalk 23:12, 3 November 2008 (UTC)

Overdue response, but I agree. I've always thought that a summary or something would be great at the start, something that goes over some key points or something, rather than just "here's what happens, blow-by-blow"--not everyone wants to read the whole thing to find out what the episode is about. --Buddy 00:31, 11 December 2008 (UTC)

1000 years being less than 1000 years

Let me explain. How long is a year? 365 days? I don't think so. 365.25 days? That's better, but still not there. Leap days (every fourth year, unless that year is dividable by 100, but not if it is also dividable with 400) was originally created to take care of that problem. Problem is, that even with these fixes, the year remains somewhat off. So, they made leap seconds, every year, when appropriate, an additional second is added to the year. It may not seem like much, but it will actually make sure that the year cycles does not go out of hand.

But, a thing like a countdown on the freezer-tube, may take care of the leap days problem, but not the leap second issue. Thus, by a thousand years, the lack of increment every year for the countdown have left it half a day behind. There are some more precise calculations on this issue, but I couldn't find them. --SvipTalk 22:34, 10 December 2008 (UTC)

So, are you saying Fry should have come after the year 3000, or before he came to the future? Chris of the Futurama 23:44, 10 December 2008 (UTC)
Most clocks also lose time. Since Applied Cryogenics is sort of a shoddy operation, they probably don't have super-expensive atomic clocks on-site. In fact, I imagine that the reason the "ding" sounds like that of a dinner timer is because it's probably built from one. Crappy clocks lose more time than good ones (even atomic clocks lose a second every million years or so). It's not inconceivable that the clock could've lost twelve hours or more in a thousand years. --Buddy 00:29, 11 December 2008 (UTC)

"couldn't be happier" indeed!

Ctrl+F and find this phrase in the article. Oddity! Perhaps removal or reworkification? --Buddy 01:12, 6 February 2009 (UTC)

Why? I don't see anything wrong with it. Futuramadude 01:24, 6 February 2009 (UTC)