From The Infosphere, the Futurama Wiki
Revision as of 21:53, 11 October 2012 by Kif (talk | contribs) (Kif moved page Talk:Robot Leela to Talk:Robo-Leela: See talk page.)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to: navigation, search

Speculation, much?

We know little to nothing about this robot and/or drawing. Despite their release of material, we are still left to guess about a lot of the plot. So this article simply decays into pure speculation, which I - ideologically - am against. Speculation should be kept to a minimum and not be the basis of a whole article.

So I ask you, can you not wait 2 weeks? --Sviptalk 08:22, 12 June 2010 (CEST)

I can. I went to trim it back to the non speculative, but what would be left isn't really worthy of an article yet, if at all. Also, what makes "robot" a certainty rather than "cyborg". - Quolnok 16:48, 12 June 2010 (CEST)
Well, the article it came with said 'robot'. --Sviptalk 18:03, 12 June 2010 (CEST)
Um, sorry. I honestly think that if you're going to have a link in an article, you'd better expect something to appear in that article. Are not the articles for the season 6 episodes merely speculation? If not, this is not either. It's all just information we currently know. Like the episode articles, this article is to be added to with more information once we see it. This does not give me reason to not have it exist.
Well, the other season 6 articles are hardly purely speculation, they have plenty of sources tied to them. However, just because there is a link, doesn't mean you should write an article for any reason. It just means, that eventually, there should ideally be an article here. I left out writing it because we knew little, but I felt there was no reason not to link to it. Of course, I may also stand corrected on that last remark. --Sviptalk 00:52, 13 June 2010 (CEST)
This article isn't speculation either. It's just not as much information. The speculation you see was also in the Rebirth article. Having very little information doesn't mean it shouldn't be here. The purpose of a wiki is for there to be a database for all known information on a topic.
Agreed. But I am not calling into question whether this article should exist anymore, only its content. --Sviptalk 12:38, 13 June 2010 (CEST)
Well, as soon as the first new episode is aired, it can be updated. I can do it myself (and try to be more concise) if you don't want to.


Is she ever referred to as "Robot Leela"? I remember hearing Human Leela call her "Robo-Leela". Maybe we should use that instead, because, after all, the name the article currently has is from June 12, which was almost two weeks prior to the premiere of "Rebirth". So what do you say? Can I move it? And do the same thing to Robot Fry while I'm at it? Sanfazer 01:46, 19 February 2011 (CET)

Makes sense to. Still, I'd wait for someone else to chime in. Teyrn of Highever 01:48, 19 February 2011 (CET)
Right. And there's no hurry. Sanfazer 02:03, 19 February 2011 (CET)
Rude? I think you are being a little too hard on yourself. Teyrn of Highever 03:52, 20 February 2011 (CET)
Hard is better than soft, but thanks. Good to know I didn't offend you... Buddy. Sanfazer 03:57, 20 February 2011 (CET)
I'm with you. I'm moving the pages now. Kif (talk) 23:52, 11 October 2012 (CEST)