Difference between revisions of "Talk:Robo-Leela"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
:::Um, sorry. I honestly think that if you're going to have a link in an article, you'd better expect something to appear in that article. Are not the articles for the season 6 episodes merely speculation? If not, this is not either. It's all just information we currently know. Like the episode articles, this article is to be added to with more information once we see it. This does not give me reason to not have it exist. | :::Um, sorry. I honestly think that if you're going to have a link in an article, you'd better expect something to appear in that article. Are not the articles for the season 6 episodes merely speculation? If not, this is not either. It's all just information we currently know. Like the episode articles, this article is to be added to with more information once we see it. This does not give me reason to not have it exist. | ||
::::Well, the other season 6 articles are hardly purely speculation, they have plenty of sources tied to them. However, just because there is a link, doesn't mean you should write an article for any reason. It just means, that ''eventually'', there should ideally be an article here. I left out writing it because we knew little, but I felt there was no reason not to link to it. Of course, I may also stand corrected on that last remark. --'''[[User:Svip|Svip]]'''<sup>[[User talk:Svip|talk]]</sup> 00:52, 13 June 2010 (CEST) | ::::Well, the other season 6 articles are hardly purely speculation, they have plenty of sources tied to them. However, just because there is a link, doesn't mean you should write an article for any reason. It just means, that ''eventually'', there should ideally be an article here. I left out writing it because we knew little, but I felt there was no reason not to link to it. Of course, I may also stand corrected on that last remark. --'''[[User:Svip|Svip]]'''<sup>[[User talk:Svip|talk]]</sup> 00:52, 13 June 2010 (CEST) | ||
:::::This article isn't speculation either. It's just not as much information. The speculation you see was also in the Rebirth article. | :::::This article isn't speculation either. It's just not as much information. The speculation you see was also in the Rebirth article. Having very little information doesn't mean it shouldn't be here. The purpose of a wiki is for there to be a database for ''all'' known information on a topic. | ||
Revision as of 04:37, 13 June 2010
Speculation, much?
We know little to nothing about this robot and/or drawing. Despite their release of material, we are still left to guess about a lot of the plot. So this article simply decays into pure speculation, which I - ideologically - am against. Speculation should be kept to a minimum and not be the basis of a whole article.
So I ask you, can you not wait 2 weeks? --Sviptalk 08:22, 12 June 2010 (CEST)
- I can. I went to trim it back to the non speculative, but what would be left isn't really worthy of an article yet, if at all. Also, what makes "robot" a certainty rather than "cyborg". - Quolnok 16:48, 12 June 2010 (CEST)
- Well, the article it came with said 'robot'. --Sviptalk 18:03, 12 June 2010 (CEST)
- Um, sorry. I honestly think that if you're going to have a link in an article, you'd better expect something to appear in that article. Are not the articles for the season 6 episodes merely speculation? If not, this is not either. It's all just information we currently know. Like the episode articles, this article is to be added to with more information once we see it. This does not give me reason to not have it exist.
- Well, the other season 6 articles are hardly purely speculation, they have plenty of sources tied to them. However, just because there is a link, doesn't mean you should write an article for any reason. It just means, that eventually, there should ideally be an article here. I left out writing it because we knew little, but I felt there was no reason not to link to it. Of course, I may also stand corrected on that last remark. --Sviptalk 00:52, 13 June 2010 (CEST)
- This article isn't speculation either. It's just not as much information. The speculation you see was also in the Rebirth article. Having very little information doesn't mean it shouldn't be here. The purpose of a wiki is for there to be a database for all known information on a topic.
- Well, the other season 6 articles are hardly purely speculation, they have plenty of sources tied to them. However, just because there is a link, doesn't mean you should write an article for any reason. It just means, that eventually, there should ideally be an article here. I left out writing it because we knew little, but I felt there was no reason not to link to it. Of course, I may also stand corrected on that last remark. --Sviptalk 00:52, 13 June 2010 (CEST)
- Um, sorry. I honestly think that if you're going to have a link in an article, you'd better expect something to appear in that article. Are not the articles for the season 6 episodes merely speculation? If not, this is not either. It's all just information we currently know. Like the episode articles, this article is to be added to with more information once we see it. This does not give me reason to not have it exist.
- Well, the article it came with said 'robot'. --Sviptalk 18:03, 12 June 2010 (CEST)