Difference between revisions of "Talk:Robo-Leela"

From The Infosphere, the Futurama Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 6: Line 6:
:I can. I went to trim it back to the non speculative, but what would be left isn't really worthy of an article yet, if at all. Also, what makes "robot" a certainty rather than "cyborg". - [[User:Quolnok|Quolnok]] 16:48, 12 June 2010 (CEST)
:I can. I went to trim it back to the non speculative, but what would be left isn't really worthy of an article yet, if at all. Also, what makes "robot" a certainty rather than "cyborg". - [[User:Quolnok|Quolnok]] 16:48, 12 June 2010 (CEST)
::Well, the [http://ccinsider.comedycentral.com/2010/05/07/countdown-to-futurama-leela-robot/ article it came with] said 'robot'. --'''[[User:Svip|Svip]]'''<sup>[[User talk:Svip|talk]]</sup> 18:03, 12 June 2010 (CEST)
::Well, the [http://ccinsider.comedycentral.com/2010/05/07/countdown-to-futurama-leela-robot/ article it came with] said 'robot'. --'''[[User:Svip|Svip]]'''<sup>[[User talk:Svip|talk]]</sup> 18:03, 12 June 2010 (CEST)
:::Um, sorry. I honestly think that if you're going to have a link in an article, you'd better expect something to appear in that article. Are not the articles for the season 6 episodes merely speculation? If not, this is not either. It's all just information we currently know. Like the episode articles, this article is to be added to with more information once we see it. This does not give me reason to not have it exist.

Revision as of 23:06, 12 June 2010

Speculation, much?

We know little to nothing about this robot and/or drawing. Despite their release of material, we are still left to guess about a lot of the plot. So this article simply decays into pure speculation, which I - ideologically - am against. Speculation should be kept to a minimum and not be the basis of a whole article.

So I ask you, can you not wait 2 weeks? --Sviptalk 08:22, 12 June 2010 (CEST)

I can. I went to trim it back to the non speculative, but what would be left isn't really worthy of an article yet, if at all. Also, what makes "robot" a certainty rather than "cyborg". - Quolnok 16:48, 12 June 2010 (CEST)
Well, the article it came with said 'robot'. --Sviptalk 18:03, 12 June 2010 (CEST)
Um, sorry. I honestly think that if you're going to have a link in an article, you'd better expect something to appear in that article. Are not the articles for the season 6 episodes merely speculation? If not, this is not either. It's all just information we currently know. Like the episode articles, this article is to be added to with more information once we see it. This does not give me reason to not have it exist.