Difference between revisions of "Talk:Robo-Leela"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
So I ask you, can you not wait 2 weeks? --'''[[User:Svip|Svip]]'''<sup>[[User talk:Svip|talk]]</sup> 08:22, 12 June 2010 (CEST) | So I ask you, can you not wait 2 weeks? --'''[[User:Svip|Svip]]'''<sup>[[User talk:Svip|talk]]</sup> 08:22, 12 June 2010 (CEST) | ||
:I can. I went to trim it back to the non speculative, but what would be left isn't really worthy of an article yet, if at all. Also, what makes "robot" a certainty rather than "cyborg". - [[User:Quolnok|Quolnok]] 16:48, 12 June 2010 (CEST) | :I can. I went to trim it back to the non speculative, but what would be left isn't really worthy of an article yet, if at all. Also, what makes "robot" a certainty rather than "cyborg". - [[User:Quolnok|Quolnok]] 16:48, 12 June 2010 (CEST) | ||
::Well, the [http://ccinsider.comedycentral.com/2010/05/07/countdown-to-futurama-leela-robot/ article it came with] said 'robot'. --'''[[User:Svip|Svip]]'''<sup>[[User talk:Svip|talk]]</sup> 18:03, 12 June 2010 (CEST) | |||
Revision as of 18:03, 12 June 2010
Speculation, much?
We know little to nothing about this robot and/or drawing. Despite their release of material, we are still left to guess about a lot of the plot. So this article simply decays into pure speculation, which I - ideologically - am against. Speculation should be kept to a minimum and not be the basis of a whole article.
So I ask you, can you not wait 2 weeks? --Sviptalk 08:22, 12 June 2010 (CEST)
- I can. I went to trim it back to the non speculative, but what would be left isn't really worthy of an article yet, if at all. Also, what makes "robot" a certainty rather than "cyborg". - Quolnok 16:48, 12 June 2010 (CEST)
- Well, the article it came with said 'robot'. --Sviptalk 18:03, 12 June 2010 (CEST)