Difference between revisions of "Talk:Hookerbots"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(New page: Apart from the article's current bad state (non-standardised link, not fully correct structure setting, low quality image and not entire use of infobox) (which are all fixable), I am more ...) |
(I didn't realize what an unhelpful comment it was till I typed it... but I'm still putting it there.) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Apart from the article's current bad state (non-standardised link, not fully correct structure setting, low quality image and not entire use of infobox) (which are all fixable), I am more wondering whether this article needs to deal with hookerbots as a group rather than characters. And then have specific hookerbots like [[Hookerbot 5000]] her own article. --'''[[User:Svip|Svip]]'''<sup>[[User talk:Svip|Talk]]</sup> 00:32, 9 December 2008 (UTC) | Apart from the article's current bad state (non-standardised link, not fully correct structure setting, low quality image and not entire use of infobox) (which are all fixable), I am more wondering whether this article needs to deal with hookerbots as a group rather than characters. And then have specific hookerbots like [[Hookerbot 5000]] her own article. --'''[[User:Svip|Svip]]'''<sup>[[User talk:Svip|Talk]]</sup> 00:32, 9 December 2008 (UTC) | ||
:I guess a hookerbot is a ''class'' of robot, much like "Bending unit"s. --[[User:Buddy13|Buddy]] 04:24, 9 December 2008 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 06:24, 9 December 2008
Apart from the article's current bad state (non-standardised link, not fully correct structure setting, low quality image and not entire use of infobox) (which are all fixable), I am more wondering whether this article needs to deal with hookerbots as a group rather than characters. And then have specific hookerbots like Hookerbot 5000 her own article. --SvipTalk 00:32, 9 December 2008 (UTC)
- I guess a hookerbot is a class of robot, much like "Bending unit"s. --Buddy 04:24, 9 December 2008 (UTC)