Difference between revisions of "Talk:Gary Gygax (character)"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Secondary?) |
|||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
Is his brief appearance in Bender's Game really enough to justify the "secondary" classification? It's just a re-use of the same footage and it's only used to dedicate the movie to his memory. It's not really a distinct appearance, is it? --[[User:Buddy13|Buddy]] 02:02, 15 December 2008 (UTC) | Is his brief appearance in Bender's Game really enough to justify the "secondary" classification? It's just a re-use of the same footage and it's only used to dedicate the movie to his memory. It's not really a distinct appearance, is it? --[[User:Buddy13|Buddy]] 02:02, 15 December 2008 (UTC) | ||
:True, but the mere fact that a film/episode was dedicated to him, something no other can claim (within Futurama, obviously), I think the "secondary" part is more out of respect, rather than technicalities. Though, I am willing to grant it is an arguable subject. And technically, in my mind, he is a tertiary character. --'''[[User:Svip|Svip]]'''<sup>[[User talk:Svip|Talk]]</sup> 02:23, 15 December 2008 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 04:23, 15 December 2008
Secondary?
Is his brief appearance in Bender's Game really enough to justify the "secondary" classification? It's just a re-use of the same footage and it's only used to dedicate the movie to his memory. It's not really a distinct appearance, is it? --Buddy 02:02, 15 December 2008 (UTC)
- True, but the mere fact that a film/episode was dedicated to him, something no other can claim (within Futurama, obviously), I think the "secondary" part is more out of respect, rather than technicalities. Though, I am willing to grant it is an arguable subject. And technically, in my mind, he is a tertiary character. --SvipTalk 02:23, 15 December 2008 (UTC)