Difference between revisions of "Talk:Episode Commentary Listing"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Humorbot 0.4 (talk | contribs) |
(Bot adding article template with developed quality and null focus.) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{article | |||
|quality=developed | |||
|focus=null | |||
}} | |||
I've noticed that some of the episode articles, which have had commentary articles created, no longer have a list of commentators on the episode credits. Is this generally considered a good or bad thing? - [[User:Quolnok|Quolnok]] 00:32, 8 May 2007 (PDT) | I've noticed that some of the episode articles, which have had commentary articles created, no longer have a list of commentators on the episode credits. Is this generally considered a good or bad thing? - [[User:Quolnok|Quolnok]] 00:32, 8 May 2007 (PDT) | ||
:Depends if you like redundancy, I prefer redundancy in cases like this, same way how I like redirect articles. Though I cannot put my finger on wither or not it is a bad/good thing. --'''[[User:Svip|Svip]]'''<sup>[[User talk:Svip|Talk]]</sup> 03:17, 8 May 2007 (PDT) | :Depends if you like redundancy, I prefer redundancy in cases like this, same way how I like redirect articles. Though I cannot put my finger on wither or not it is a bad/good thing. --'''[[User:Svip|Svip]]'''<sup>[[User talk:Svip|Talk]]</sup> 03:17, 8 May 2007 (PDT) | ||
::I'm not sure if its good or bad but I'm leaning towards good since its kind of useless to have a list of commentators if the commentary article list them. - [[User:Humorbot 0.4|Humorbot 0.4]] 07:43, 8 May 2007 (PDT) | ::I'm not sure if its good or bad but I'm leaning towards good since its kind of useless to have a list of commentators if the commentary article list them. - [[User:Humorbot 0.4|Humorbot 0.4]] 07:43, 8 May 2007 (PDT) | ||
Revision as of 03:49, 23 March 2009
Episode Commentary Listing
The "Episode Commentary Listing" article has been labelled the following levels:
This article is thoroughly developed.
No focus level has been assigned.
I've noticed that some of the episode articles, which have had commentary articles created, no longer have a list of commentators on the episode credits. Is this generally considered a good or bad thing? - Quolnok 00:32, 8 May 2007 (PDT)
- Depends if you like redundancy, I prefer redundancy in cases like this, same way how I like redirect articles. Though I cannot put my finger on wither or not it is a bad/good thing. --SvipTalk 03:17, 8 May 2007 (PDT)
- I'm not sure if its good or bad but I'm leaning towards good since its kind of useless to have a list of commentators if the commentary article list them. - Humorbot 0.4 07:43, 8 May 2007 (PDT)