Difference between revisions of "Talk:Bender's first-born son"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
JoeyMousepad (talk | contribs) |
|||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
}} | }} | ||
== Name == | |||
Is it possible that Benders First Born is actually [[Junior]]? Sure they look different, but we've seen robots change their appearance over their lifespan [[Teenage_Mutant_Leela%27s_Hurdles|In this episode]]. even a precocious tyke such as himself wouldn't have had that long to have children. | Is it possible that Benders First Born is actually [[Junior]]? Sure they look different, but we've seen robots change their appearance over their lifespan [[Teenage_Mutant_Leela%27s_Hurdles|In this episode]]. even a precocious tyke such as himself wouldn't have had that long to have children. | ||
Unless, of course, he did so during the events of [[Benders Big Score]], and "First" is counted chronologically.--[[User:JoeyMousepad|JoeyMousepad]] 01:09, 4 May 2009 (UTC) | Unless, of course, he did so during the events of [[Benders Big Score]], and "First" is counted chronologically.--[[User:JoeyMousepad|JoeyMousepad]] 01:09, 4 May 2009 (UTC) | ||
:Hm, I suppose that is plausible, but [[Junior]] can also be regarded as "questionable canon". We know that Bender was build in 2998, but there is really nothing stopping from doing crazy things there. And if the deleted scenes and the comics are to be believed, the Crushinator conceives Junior in early 3000, which would make the argument about whether his firstborn son should be a lot more mature by 3008, given how quickly robots age. If anything, I'd say that the "First Born" son of Bender challenges the canon in the comics. --'''[[User:Svip|Svip]]'''<sup>[[User talk:Svip|Talk]]</sup> 11:00, 4 May 2009 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 13:00, 4 May 2009
Bender's first-born son
The "Bender's first-born son" article has been labelled the following levels:
This article is thoroughly developed.
No focus level has been assigned.
Name
Is it possible that Benders First Born is actually Junior? Sure they look different, but we've seen robots change their appearance over their lifespan In this episode. even a precocious tyke such as himself wouldn't have had that long to have children.
Unless, of course, he did so during the events of Benders Big Score, and "First" is counted chronologically.--JoeyMousepad 01:09, 4 May 2009 (UTC)
- Hm, I suppose that is plausible, but Junior can also be regarded as "questionable canon". We know that Bender was build in 2998, but there is really nothing stopping from doing crazy things there. And if the deleted scenes and the comics are to be believed, the Crushinator conceives Junior in early 3000, which would make the argument about whether his firstborn son should be a lot more mature by 3008, given how quickly robots age. If anything, I'd say that the "First Born" son of Bender challenges the canon in the comics. --SvipTalk 11:00, 4 May 2009 (UTC)