Difference between revisions of "Talk:Beautiful women"

From The Infosphere, the Futurama Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m (Sanfazer moved page Talk:Beautiful Women to Talk:Beautiful women)
 
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
Conflating with 'Fast Cars' would reflect their association in the popular imagination, and honour their yoked appearance in the episode's bio of the Professor.
Conflating with 'Fast Cars' would reflect their association in the popular imagination, and honour their yoked appearance in the episode's bio of the Professor.
:We could link to the [[Fast Cars]] article.  Which exists.  --'''[[User:Svip|Svip]]'''<sup>[[User talk:Svip|Talk]]</sup> 05:23, 8 April 2008 (PDT)
:We could link to the [[Fast Cars]] article.  Which exists.  --'''[[User:Svip|Svip]]'''<sup>[[User talk:Svip|Talk]]</sup> 05:23, 8 April 2008 (PDT)
This article's existence is dubious, but perhaps if we extrapolate and fill in junk. Like maybe he actually didn't invent them (and the narrator was just oversimplifying), but helped with certain technology to make them more beautiful (implants, genetic engineering, that sort of thing)...? Either way, needs a bit more work. If we can't think of anything to add, we should combine the things from that sentence into one article and redirect the individual items to it. In fact, maybe do that anyway, but yeah. --[[User:Buddy13|Buddy]] 17:49, 8 April 2008 (PDT)

Latest revision as of 05:23, 21 August 2013

Conflating with 'Fast Cars' would reflect their association in the popular imagination, and honour their yoked appearance in the episode's bio of the Professor.

We could link to the Fast Cars article. Which exists. --SvipTalk 05:23, 8 April 2008 (PDT)

This article's existence is dubious, but perhaps if we extrapolate and fill in junk. Like maybe he actually didn't invent them (and the narrator was just oversimplifying), but helped with certain technology to make them more beautiful (implants, genetic engineering, that sort of thing)...? Either way, needs a bit more work. If we can't think of anything to add, we should combine the things from that sentence into one article and redirect the individual items to it. In fact, maybe do that anyway, but yeah. --Buddy 17:49, 8 April 2008 (PDT)