Difference between revisions of "Table:Spotlight ("let's make this FA")"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
Wouldn't it be cool having an article every week or fortnight with a Main Page spotlight? Taking a random, okay article and push people to try to make it perfect? Best case scenario, it's standard to have that article be [[I:FA|featured]] a few weeks later. What say you? - [[User:Aki|aki]]<sup>[[User talk:Aki|talk]]</sup> 15:16, 15 June 2011 (CEST) | Wouldn't it be cool having an article every week or fortnight with a Main Page spotlight? Taking a random, okay article and push people to try to make it perfect? Best case scenario, it's standard to have that article be [[I:FA|featured]] a few weeks later. What say you? - [[User:Aki|aki]]<sup>[[User talk:Aki|talk]]</sup> 15:16, 15 June 2011 (CEST) | ||
:Wikipedia has a number of collaborations where an article is nominated and the community works to improve it. I can't see why we couldn't do one per week. -- [[User:DeepSpaceHomer|DeepSpaceHomer]] 15:37, 15 June 2011 (CEST) | :Wikipedia has a number of collaborations where an article is nominated and the community works to improve it. I can't see why we couldn't do one per week. -- [[User:DeepSpaceHomer|DeepSpaceHomer]] 15:37, 15 June 2011 (CEST) | ||
::Agreed. <joe>LET'S DO IT!!!</joe> - [[User:Aki|aki]]<sup>[[User talk:Aki|talk]]</sup> 19:01, 15 June 2011 (CEST) | |||
Revision as of 19:01, 15 June 2011
Discussion
Wouldn't it be cool having an article every week or fortnight with a Main Page spotlight? Taking a random, okay article and push people to try to make it perfect? Best case scenario, it's standard to have that article be featured a few weeks later. What say you? - akitalk 15:16, 15 June 2011 (CEST)
- Wikipedia has a number of collaborations where an article is nominated and the community works to improve it. I can't see why we couldn't do one per week. -- DeepSpaceHomer 15:37, 15 June 2011 (CEST)