Table:So slowwwww

From The Infosphere, the Futurama Wiki
Revision as of 21:43, 4 March 2013 by Buddy13 (talk | contribs)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
The printable version is no longer supported and may have rendering errors. Please update your browser bookmarks and please use the default browser print function instead.

Discussion

Is it just on my end, or has the site been incredibly sluggish the last week or two? --Buddy (talk) 10:59, 22 December 2012 (CET)

So yucking sluggish. Sanfazer (talk) 17:55, 22 December 2012 (CET).
I have recognised this slowness for weeks by now, and I apologise. Tonight, I finally got an opportunity to do something about it. I hope you'll recognise this increase in speed as well. --Sviptalk 00:47, 23 January 2013 (CET)
I wouldn't say it's got cheetah blood rubbed on its engine, but it's definitely an improvement. Good job :-D --Buddy (talk) 05:49, 23 January 2013 (CET)
Well, it was working well for a while, then it became incredibly slow again. I think I might have solved it now, though. --Sviptalk 18:35, 23 January 2013 (CET)
Wow, seems to be working beautifully now! --Buddy (talk) 18:36, 23 January 2013 (CET)

Well, I hope you are all pleased with the new speeds. It seems to be working great now. --Sviptalk 00:53, 29 January 2013 (CET)

It really does. Sanfazer (talk) 21:26, 29 January 2013 (CET).
The pool is a little off, however.
In other news, happy birthday, Infosphere! (Hasn't she grown? I trust the father is very excited. Seven is always special.) Sanfazer (talk) 23:39, 30 January 2013 (CET).
It was so slow that I was unable to comment on the slowness, even. Evidently this is no longer the case. Huzzahs are in order. - Quolnok (talk) 13:20, 31 January 2013 (CET)
I assume Amy is the father. --Sviptalk 13:38, 31 January 2013 (CET)
She may be a father, but, boy, does she look good in a pool. Sanfazer (talk) 19:07, 31 January 2013 (CET).

I've decided to improve the speed even more:

Server Software:        Apache/2.2.16
Server Hostname:        theinfosphere.org
Server Port:            80

Document Path:          /Special:Random
Document Length:        0 bytes

Concurrency Level:      1
Time taken for tests:   1.009 seconds
Complete requests:      50
Failed requests:        0
Write errors:           0
Non-2xx responses:      50
Total transferred:      22900 bytes
HTML transferred:       0 bytes
Requests per second:    49.55 [#/sec] (mean)
Time per request:       20.182 [ms] (mean)
Time per request:       20.182 [ms] (mean, across all concurrent requests)
Transfer rate:          22.16 [Kbytes/sec] received

Connection Times (ms)
              min  mean[+/-sd] median   max
Connect:        9   10   0.3     10      11
Processing:     9   10   0.3     10      11
Waiting:        9   10   0.3     10      11
Total:         19   20   0.5     20      21

Percentage of the requests served within a certain time (ms)
  50%     20
  66%     20
  75%     20
  80%     21
  90%     21
  95%     21
  98%     21
  99%     21
 100%     21 (longest request)

To summarise: On a 100+ mbit connection (as the above is), the average response time is 20ms. At home, however, I get an average of 130 ms (I have a 20/2 mbit connection). --Sviptalk 20:49, 4 March 2013 (CET)

w00t! It's so nice now! --Buddy (talk) 21:43, 4 March 2013 (CET)