Table:NNYC wikipedia layout?

From The Infosphere, the Futurama Wiki
Revision as of 03:20, 6 February 2010 by 67.176.104.253 (talk) (→‎Discussion: now i don't have to navigate to it the hard way)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
The printable version is no longer supported and may have rendering errors. Please update your browser bookmarks and please use the default browser print function instead.

Discussion

Hi, I'm new to the Infosphere, but I have been a member of the Wikipedia for several years. What caught my eye was the New New York article, in particular the layout. Right now it is more like a gallery with many beautiful screenshots. I observe the previous versions and realized that it has always been that way. Would it be possible to imitate the original New York City article to meet the quality standards? I would not erase those achievements, just restructure. But before I would do that, I think I should ask whether it is okay. There is still the possibility to reverse it. --Trickymaster 18:29, 11 January 2010 (UTC)

We have been discussing revising the layout of that article, but could not really find an appropriate solution. Your solution seems decent, but I guess what we feared were more specifically the lack of content to write on the subject. But I guess it may actually be doable. --Sviptalk 19:15, 11 January 2010 (UTC)
Okay, done. It is still just an idea and you can reverse it, if it does not fit. But I think these categories would give users an idea of what has to be added. E.g. I think it would be good to incorporate the article about pests into the environment section.--Trickymaster 20:06, 11 January 2010 (UTC)
Maybe if you boldface the names to make it show better? (e.g. Little Bitaly) 99.245.211.102 21:35, 11 January 2010 (UTC)
Hey, I was intentionally avoiding to boldface names as I read about plans to rearrange those images. But I agree with you that the Boroughs should be boldface.--Trickymaster 23:08, 11 January 2010 (UTC)
Well, I like where this is headed. Certainly more room to change things up though. - Quolnok 12:24, 12 January 2010 (UTC)
Thanks. I hope others can contribute to the change. I don't know that much about Futurama.--Trickymaster 06:25, 13 January 2010 (UTC)