Difference between revisions of "Table:Infosphere user"

From The Infosphere, the Futurama Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
 
(7 intermediate revisions by 5 users not shown)
Line 7: Line 7:
{| border=1 cellspacing=0 cellpadding=6 style="border-collapse:collapse"
{| border=1 cellspacing=0 cellpadding=6 style="border-collapse:collapse"
|- bgcolor=#2363c3
|- bgcolor=#2363c3
! '''Infospherian''' !! '''Infospheroid''' <!-- !! '''Word 3''' -->
! '''Infospherian''' !! '''Infospheroid''' !! '''Infospheran''' <!-- !! '''Word 4''' -->
|- valign="top"
|- valign="top"
|
|
*[[User:Sanfazer|Sanfazer]] ([[User talk:Sanfazer|talk]])
*[[User:Sanfazer|Sanfazer]] ([[User talk:Sanfazer|talk]])
*[[User:Trickymaster|Trickymaster]] ([[User talk:Trickymaster|talk]])
||
||
*[[User:Buddy13|Buddy13]] ([[User talk:Buddy13|talk]])
*[[User:Buddy13|Buddy13]] ([[User talk:Buddy13|talk]])
*[[User:Quolnok|Quolnok]] ([[User talk:Quolnok|talk]])
*[[User:Zylex13|Zylex13]] ([[User talk:Zylex13|talk]])
*[[User:Kif|Kif]] ([[User talk:Kif|talk]])
||
*[[User:DeepSpaceHomer|DeepSpaceHomer]] ([[User talk:DeepSpaceHomer|talk]])
<!--
<!--
||
||
Line 32: Line 38:
:::::Deep. Do you mean ''Infospherian''?
:::::Deep. Do you mean ''Infospherian''?
:::::Buddy. We can, but, as far as I know, not with templates such as ''Infosphere:Accept''. I've taken the liberty to add a ballot box. [[User:Sanfazer|Sanfazer]] ([[User talk:Sanfazer|talk]]) 19:17, 13 November 2011 (CET)
:::::Buddy. We can, but, as far as I know, not with templates such as ''Infosphere:Accept''. I've taken the liberty to add a ballot box. [[User:Sanfazer|Sanfazer]] ([[User talk:Sanfazer|talk]]) 19:17, 13 November 2011 (CET)
::::::No, I meant "Infospheran", like "Roman".  Sounds better to my ears. -- [[User:DeepSpaceHomer|DeepSpaceHomer]] ([[User talk:DeepSpaceHomer|talk]]) 20:22, 13 November 2011 (CET)
:::::::Oh. Okay then. It's been added to the box. [[User:Sanfazer|Sanfazer]] ([[User talk:Sanfazer|talk]]) 21:13, 13 November 2011 (CET)
::::::::As it isn't simply yes/no, I'd rather see this done in the form of preferential voting, wherein all voters can assign each option a rank, first choice given a 1 and so on, then the item with least votes has all it's votes reassigned to the voter's next preference. [[User:Quolnok|Quolnok]] ([[User talk:Quolnok|talk]]) 04:35, 14 November 2011 (CET)
:::::::::Interesting. Can you set it up? [[User:Sanfazer|Sanfazer]] ([[User talk:Sanfazer|talk]]) 19:31, 14 November 2011 (CET)

Latest revision as of 17:32, 27 July 2012

Ballot

Infospherian Infospheroid Infospheran

Discussion

A Wikipedia user is a Wikipedian, but what is an Infosphere user? An Infospherian? An Infospheric? An Infospheroid? I don't know. Apparently, we don't have a name. And we need one, don't we?

I propose creating a project page similar to this one, only smaller. Of the three names that I mentioned, I like Infospherian the most. What about you?

Feel free to suggest other names. Sanfazer (talk) 20:10, 7 November 2011 (CET)

Personally, I find most Wikipedians to be self-righteous assholes. (The robot devil said "That's alright, you can say that here.") I like "Spheroid" or "Spheronian" ... There are so many suffixes we could affix to "Infosphere"... 'spherite. 'spheron. 'spheroid. 'spherian. 'spheronian. 'spheritis. 'spherephobia. 'spherosis. 'spheritudinal. Wait, I think I got off track somewhere in there... *wanders off* --Buddy (talk) 10:38, 12 November 2011 (CET)
I blame that on grammar. And this tie on all editors who don't opine. Who will step forward and save us from this uncertainty?!? And by us I mean... Sanfazer (talk) 19:39, 12 November 2011 (CET)
I'm legally prohibited from relieving uncertainty. However, I do like to opine, and I think that "Infospheran" sounds good. -- DeepSpaceHomer (talk) 04:11, 13 November 2011 (CET)
Perhaps a vote is in order? Can we do a vote with more than two options? --Buddy (talk) 07:59, 13 November 2011 (CET)
Deep. Do you mean Infospherian?
Buddy. We can, but, as far as I know, not with templates such as Infosphere:Accept. I've taken the liberty to add a ballot box. Sanfazer (talk) 19:17, 13 November 2011 (CET)
No, I meant "Infospheran", like "Roman". Sounds better to my ears. -- DeepSpaceHomer (talk) 20:22, 13 November 2011 (CET)
Oh. Okay then. It's been added to the box. Sanfazer (talk) 21:13, 13 November 2011 (CET)
As it isn't simply yes/no, I'd rather see this done in the form of preferential voting, wherein all voters can assign each option a rank, first choice given a 1 and so on, then the item with least votes has all it's votes reassigned to the voter's next preference. Quolnok (talk) 04:35, 14 November 2011 (CET)
Interesting. Can you set it up? Sanfazer (talk) 19:31, 14 November 2011 (CET)