Difference between revisions of "Table:Forum style for the Conference Table?"

From The Infosphere, the Futurama Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m
(→‎Discussion: Second.)
Line 11: Line 11:
::::Ooh, fancy. It's like a hybrid of Wiki and Forum formats. Me likey. --[[User:Buddy13|Buddy]] 21:31, 29 June 2009 (UTC)
::::Ooh, fancy. It's like a hybrid of Wiki and Forum formats. Me likey. --[[User:Buddy13|Buddy]] 21:31, 29 June 2009 (UTC)
:::::seconded over here! --[[User:Scruffy|I'm Scruffy... the Janitor.]] 21:35, 29 June 2009 (UTC)
:::::seconded over here! --[[User:Scruffy|I'm Scruffy... the Janitor.]] 21:35, 29 June 2009 (UTC)
::::::Am I the only one that thinks it's funny that Scruffy just seconded? Cuz it is. --[[User:Buddy13|Buddy]] 21:38, 29 June 2009 (UTC)

Revision as of 23:38, 29 June 2009

Discussion

Having topics like this can be difficult to keep track of, so I am thinking we should use a forum like approach as on Memory Alpha and Wookiepedia. I can easily implement it. I believe I will turn the current threads into threads. I just need the go. --SvipTalk 19:33, 29 June 2009 (UTC)

I've always thought it would be a better format, I just didn't think it was an option without setting up a separate forum... --Buddy 20:09, 29 June 2009 (UTC)
This is why they write extensions for MediaWiki. :D --SvipTalk 20:14, 29 June 2009 (UTC)
There! Did it. How it looks? --SvipTalk 21:28, 29 June 2009 (UTC)
Ooh, fancy. It's like a hybrid of Wiki and Forum formats. Me likey. --Buddy 21:31, 29 June 2009 (UTC)
seconded over here! --I'm Scruffy... the Janitor. 21:35, 29 June 2009 (UTC)
Am I the only one that thinks it's funny that Scruffy just seconded? Cuz it is. --Buddy 21:38, 29 June 2009 (UTC)