Difference between revisions of "Table:Active Show"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
: Yes, that is a rule of ours. I agree it should be more open. How does Lostpedia for instance highlight this? Via a notice when editing articles? A sitenotice? Suggestions? --'''[[User:Svip|Svip]]'''<sup>[[User talk:Svip|talk]]</sup> 15:50, 25 June 2010 (CEST) | : Yes, that is a rule of ours. I agree it should be more open. How does Lostpedia for instance highlight this? Via a notice when editing articles? A sitenotice? Suggestions? --'''[[User:Svip|Svip]]'''<sup>[[User talk:Svip|talk]]</sup> 15:50, 25 June 2010 (CEST) | ||
::Yeah, a notice somewhere. If it's an unwritten rule, then it should go into writing. We could probably add it to the welcome message. But I think a notice when editing would be best. - [[User:Quolnok|Quolnok]] 05:46, 26 June 2010 (CEST) | |||
Revision as of 05:46, 26 June 2010
Spoilers et cetera
Now that we are focusing on an active and ongoing show, I suggest we make a clear rule about spoilers and the like. Similar to how Lostpedia did it, where they wouldn't post anything on an episode until the official airdate, I recommend we do the same. I'm sure we already do, but the rule should be visible somehow. --Buddy 15:47, 25 June 2010 (CEST)
- Yes, that is a rule of ours. I agree it should be more open. How does Lostpedia for instance highlight this? Via a notice when editing articles? A sitenotice? Suggestions? --Sviptalk 15:50, 25 June 2010 (CEST)
- Yeah, a notice somewhere. If it's an unwritten rule, then it should go into writing. We could probably add it to the welcome message. But I think a notice when editing would be best. - Quolnok 05:46, 26 June 2010 (CEST)