Difference between revisions of "Infosphere:Conference Table/Old format"

From The Infosphere, the Futurama Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 78: Line 78:
==Dead Much?==
==Dead Much?==
Is it just me or is it a little dead around here?
Is it just me or is it a little dead around here?
:I'm much busier now than I was over the summer.  I'm back at college and am involved in other things, but I still check out what has been going on here every few days.  I just don't have much free time in which to contribute. - [[User:ClonedWizard|ClonedWizard]] 08:52, 22 September 2006 (PDT)

Revision as of 17:52, 22 September 2006

Good morning, people.

The Conference Table is for discussion of the Infosphere, and proposals for new ideas. For information about upcoming changes to the Infosphere, see Current events.

Alien Language Sightings

Perhaps it might be better if, instead of putting the sightings up at the top, they were put down in the "Additional Info" sections. Then you can be a bit more detailed than just telling how many sightings there are. It will also keep the Alien Languages page about alien languages, rather than being a list of sightings. What do you think? Buddy13 FW16.png

I dunno, I have mixed feelings about this. There's already a lot of info crammed into each episode page, and it would make it a lot harder for people searching for alien language references in general. Then again, it would make it slightly easier for people to find translations for sightings in an episode they had watched. I'm on the fence. User:Gopher/sig

Something I found whilest wandering Meta

Interwiki linking looks like it could be somewhat useful. If we set it up we'd be able to link to things in other wikis where necessary (such as from trivia about an obscure joke) withoutout the little arrow thing in the middle of the text. setup guide - Quolnok 23:55, 11 July 2006 (PDT)

I am working on this. Forgot to mention. Buddy 16:21, 12 September 2006 (PDT)

Poster Guy

Should probably have an article about the "poster guy" who appears in the various posters throughout the show. "Poster Child" is the proper proverbial term, but I like "Poster Guy". Any thoughts? He's a psuedocharacter, but I think he should have his own article (as opposed to being added to the Minor Characters page), so we can show several screenshots and discuss him. Buddy13 FW16.png 20:48, 15 July 2006 (PDT)

Poster guy is definately deserving of some mention, there's probably enough for a new page. - Quolnok 20:53, 15 July 2006 (PDT)

I created two links so far (in the Characters section from two episodes I was sure he was in), all that's left, I guess, is creating the page and giving it content. Buddy 16:21, 12 September 2006 (PDT)

Throwing down the gauntlet

In light of the announced ressurection of the show, I think it's time to throw down the gauntlet, as it were. We need to commit ourseles to making the Infosphere the most comprehensive site for Futurama info on the web by 2008. We're well on our way, and it can only keep going up from here. Lets keep those articles coming! User:Gopher/sig

Back in Black - or was it Purple?

Well, after a prolongued absence I plan to take up my work again and finally finish Season 4 episodes. Keep up the good work!! - Whotmsig.jpg[Whaler on the Moon]

Good to see contributors coming back, ironically (or coincidentally?) I'm about to decrease the amount of stuff I'm doing around here (probably not to none) for a while due to Uni assignments that'll start needing to be done. - Quolnok 21:26, 17 July 2006 (PDT)

PE Building Floorplan

I'm asking for help. I have a few key episodes that I know of, but I'd like you guys to take any screenshots you can find (even low quality ones) and mail them to me (check my userpage for the email link). I'd like pictures of known areas of the PE building, covering as much of the floorplan as possible. Like in some scenes, you can see the TV area through the door in the conference room area (and that's pretty consistent, since on the outside, the TV area window is near where the conference table spot should be). Stuff like that. I'm going to start working on a map, and I'm hoping to be as accurate as possible. Areas that are difficult to locate should also be sent, and you can let me know where you think the area is. I'll color-code the map so speculative areas and canon areas are distinguishable. Thanks for the help. Buddy13 FW16.png 14:19, 12 August 2006 (PDT)

Template Request

I'd like to see a ProductArticleTemplate created. After seeing the page on Popplers, it seems that a bit more polish is needed on the subject. The only two articles in the Products category are Dr. FlimFlam's Miracle Cream and Slurm, and both are inconsistent even with each other. A standard of some sort needs to be created. What sort of information would be common to most product pages? Product type (be it medical, food, industrial, et cetera)? Maybe manufacturer? Any ideas? Buddy13 FW16.png

Logos

I'd like to create (or see someone create, as I'm limited in my capability right now) super-clean logos for companies and products (i.e., the Planet Express logo, Slurm logo, MomCorp log, et cetera), to be used as the top image on the relevant pages. The preferred format would be SVG, to allow scaling to any size (and they're prettier), but PNG also works, if you don't have the ability to create SVG graphics. Anyone interested in creating such things? Buddy13 FW16.png 11:48, 11 August 2006 (PDT)

Planet Express Logo.png
I went ahead and created the logo for Planet Express, though it's not quite complete. I couldn't find a font that matched the original graphic, so I'm going to have to trace them with paths (interesting--no wait, that other thing: Tedious). I'd love to hear some feedback on this. The original is a SVG, but this is PNG. Both good. I'm working on interwiki links right now and then I'll figure out how to allow uploads of SVG graphics... Buddy13 FW16.png 18:32, 19 August 2006 (PDT)
I've created and uploaded two version of the Slurm logo as well. I'd love some feedback. I'd also like to know which MomCorp logo I should do: The one on the ship, where the mom head is above the "m"; or the one on the sign outside the conference area in Obsoletely Fabulous, where the head is centered over the "momcorp" as a whole? Which one? Buddy13 FW16.png 19:58, 23 August 2006 (PDT)

I think the logos look good, and most of the others seem to share this observation, otherwise there would surely have beem some nitpicking ;). Go ahead, you did good. -Whaler on the Moon 07:39, 24 August 2006 (PDT)

[Sneaks back in for a while] Yeah they look good. I don't think many people will have SVG editing software though. - Quolnok 07:42, 24 August 2006 (PDT)
Splat!
Luckily, Inkscape is a free open-source program. (here) But as I'm learning, if you're not familiar with vector-based drawing programs, it can be hard to learn. Luckily the interface is pretty simple and the help and tutorials are good. I'm particularly proud of the Slurm splat logo. The splat is actually a very random and curvy star/polygon object. SVG is very versatile and simple, though, so if there are any problems at all (like colours are off or shapes are wrong, etc), let me know and it'll take less than five minutes to fix. Buddy13 FW16.png 08:35, 24 August 2006 (PDT)

New Users and Bad Pages

The new and useless pages are getting obnoxious. From now on, new users shouldn't create new pages before reading the help pages (especially the page on templates). Any sysops who see a new page that is terribly formatted (dead end page, orphan page, non-standard format), just go ahead and delete it. Then put a note on the creator's talk page reminding them (nicely) to read the help pages. If it's an anonymous IP, you can still send them a message via "Talk" on the recent changes page. The QualityControl and Stub tags don't seem to be helping much (nobody's trying to correct pages marked thusly), so deletion seems to be the best option, and the page can be saved for someone who's read the help pages. Once it's created again, the old version will be in the history, so any valuable information they posted can be salvaged. Any other thoughts? Am I being too harsh? Buddy13 FW16.png 12:21, 24 August 2006 (PDT)

Whoo-hoo!

Only six more episodes to go! Good job, guys! Buddy13 FW16.png 11:44, 1 September 2006 (PDT)

Yes, astounding, isn't it... but the rest will be tough going, at least for me, as I find most of the remaining episodes to be sub-average. I can maybe do one or two more, like Bender gets made and Time keeps on slipping, but not much more. About time some other people did some work on the episodes as well, I think. --Whaler on the Moon 13:02, 1 September 2006 (PDT)
Actually, I've been keeping track of certain article's status on my talk page, the following additional episodes are currently incomplete, or at least labled that way:
...so there's 11. - Quolnok 19:28, 2 September 2006 (PDT)

Conference Table vs. Current Events

Right now the two pages are serving similar purposes. Anyone want to suggest a different purpose for one or the other? Or we could just delete the Conference Table and migrate these discussions to the Current Events page. Current Events could also be a news page or similar. Suggestions welcome! Buddy13 FW16.png 14:33, 7 September 2006 (PDT)

It always threw me off having the 2 separate pages. It doesn't help that the Conference Table isn't linked in the sidebar. I would always have to remember it was linked from the main page. I'd favor merging the two pages. - ClonedWizard 15:32, 7 September 2006 (PDT)
As I see it, the difference between the two (if any) should be that CE is more formal stating big changes. However they should probably merge due to the high simiilarity, if not both should be linked from the side. - Quolnok 19:34, 7 September 2006 (PDT)
I'll add the Conference table to the sidebar. And if I'm understanding your statement correctly, it might be good to say that the conference table is for discussing changes, and the Current Events is good for announcing changes, right? Buddy13 FW16.png 13:07, 10 September 2006 (PDT)
More or less. CE would have major things happening soonish, CT has things people would like to happen and generic discussions. We'd also need a sentance at the top of each, directing people to the correct page. - Quolnok 03:12, 11 September 2006 (PDT)

I am beginning the migration. In the process I'm going to delete a lot of sections that are inactive or solved/completed. Buddy 16:08, 12 September 2006 (PDT)

Commentaries

I was reading the talk on the Wikipedia page, and someone thought it might be a good idea to have an article on the commentaries. Someone else said it was fancruft, which it would be on Wikipedia, but such articles may be quite apropriate here. Anyone agree? Disagree? I was thinking we could do "sister" articles, like for "Space Pilot 3000", have "Space Pilot 3000 (commentary)"? I know this would be hard for "Mother's Day (episode)" and "Mars University (episode)", but I think the solution is to remove the "(episode)" part and have a linke like they do on Wikipedia. Something like "This article is about the episode, for the holiday/place, see ..." you know?

Yeah, it might work. I have no idea what would be involved though. A list of topics discussed and highlights with quotes? If we do this I can knock up a navbar for the articles with an extra link to the episode article. - Quolnok 03:12, 11 September 2006 (PDT)
Template_talk:CommentaryNavTemplate looks right. I think commentary articles probably should be linked either in credits or trivia, but if not Template:EpisodeNavTemplateV2 would be able to be moved to the current template's location and all current articles (excluding the articles ending with "(episode)") would link to the uncreated commentary pages.
Yes, I was thinking that in the nav area would be the ideal place, with additional links in trivia or such if references are made. Buddy 17:50, 16 September 2006 (PDT)

Dead Much?

Is it just me or is it a little dead around here?

I'm much busier now than I was over the summer. I'm back at college and am involved in other things, but I still check out what has been going on here every few days. I just don't have much free time in which to contribute. - ClonedWizard 08:52, 22 September 2006 (PDT)