Difference between revisions of "Amy's obscene tattoo"

From The Infosphere, the Futurama Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(Bot edit: General fixes, etc.)
(Additional Info)
Line 7: Line 7:
 
}}
 
}}
 
This tattoo is seen in "[[A Fishful of Dollars]]" after [[Amy Wong|Amy]] makes a remark about the low definition televisions from the 20th century. The mysterious tattoo cannot be seen due to our primitive technology, but is described as being "obscene". It appears to be two red figures, possibly [[Decapodian|Decapodians]].
 
This tattoo is seen in "[[A Fishful of Dollars]]" after [[Amy Wong|Amy]] makes a remark about the low definition televisions from the 20th century. The mysterious tattoo cannot be seen due to our primitive technology, but is described as being "obscene". It appears to be two red figures, possibly [[Decapodian|Decapodians]].
 
== Additional Info ==
 
=== Trivia ===
 
*Amy also seems to have talking tattoos (seen in "[[Three Hundred Big Boys]]"), but her obscene tattoo does not appear later than its first appearance.
 
*Amy's tattoo exists as a prank on the audience. It is deliberately blurred by the animators. Even in the 31st century it will not be visibly clear.
 
 
=== Quote ===
 
*'''[[Bender]]''': Hey! Get a load of this pathetic 20th century T.V.<br>'''[[Fry]]''': What's wrong with it?<br>'''Bender''': Well, aside from causing eye cancer, these things had a lousy low-definition picture.<br>'''Amy''': That's true. I bet on a T.V. like this you couldn't even make out my obscene tattoo.<br>'''Bender''': *Whistles*<br>'''[[Turanga Leela|Leela]]''': That's cute.
 
 
=== Appearances ===
 
*{{e|1ACV06}}
 
 
[[Category:Misc]]
 

Revision as of 20:40, 24 December 2010

Amy Wong's Obscene Tattoo
ObsceneTattoo.png
TypeTattoo
Owner(s)Amy Wong
First appearance"A Fishful of Dollars" (1ACV06)
Episode

This tattoo is seen in "A Fishful of Dollars" after Amy makes a remark about the low definition televisions from the 20th century. The mysterious tattoo cannot be seen due to our primitive technology, but is described as being "obscene". It appears to be two red figures, possibly Decapodians.