Difference between revisions of "Talk:Cool-O-Meter"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(New section: Coulombmeter) |
|||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
(Yes, I checked the spelling! ;) -- Are we sure about this? I mean, it seems like a stretch to think they intentionally used this obscure term, when it seems more likely that they just took a standard format of taking *thing you want measured*+ometer. Anyone? --[[User:Buddy13|Buddy]] 00:45, 10 July 2008 (CEST) | (Yes, I checked the spelling! ;) -- Are we sure about this? I mean, it seems like a stretch to think they intentionally used this obscure term, when it seems more likely that they just took a standard format of taking *thing you want measured*+ometer. Anyone? --[[User:Buddy13|Buddy]] 00:45, 10 July 2008 (CEST) | ||
:Hm... I cannot think of other ways of pronouncing "Cool-o-meter" other than what would sound similar to Coulombeter. I think it is more likely to be a coincidence, unless it is directly mentioned on the commentary that it is a pun. It seems a like a stretch indeed. --'''[[User:Svip|Svip]]'''<sup>[[User talk:Svip|Talk]]</sup> 00:53, 10 July 2008 (CEST) | |||
Revision as of 00:53, 10 July 2008
Could we have a picture with the Thumbs up at the 'Oh yeah' level of mega-fonzies? Igotbit 09:19, 6 June 2007 (PDT)
Coulombmeter
(Yes, I checked the spelling! ;) -- Are we sure about this? I mean, it seems like a stretch to think they intentionally used this obscure term, when it seems more likely that they just took a standard format of taking *thing you want measured*+ometer. Anyone? --Buddy 00:45, 10 July 2008 (CEST)
- Hm... I cannot think of other ways of pronouncing "Cool-o-meter" other than what would sound similar to Coulombeter. I think it is more likely to be a coincidence, unless it is directly mentioned on the commentary that it is a pun. It seems a like a stretch indeed. --SvipTalk 00:53, 10 July 2008 (CEST)