Difference between revisions of "Talk:Hyper-Chicken"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Bot adding article template with developed quality and null focus.) |
|||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{article | |||
|quality=developed | |||
|focus=null | |||
}} | |||
I'm not convinced that he "seems to be successful", since he's been indited for incompetance. <small>-- the preceding unsigned comment was written by [[User:203.96.151.16|203.96.151.16]]{{#if:{{{2|}}}| before {{{2}}}|}}.</small> | I'm not convinced that he "seems to be successful", since he's been indited for incompetance. <small>-- the preceding unsigned comment was written by [[User:203.96.151.16|203.96.151.16]]{{#if:{{{2|}}}| before {{{2}}}|}}.</small> | ||
:True. But due to the fact that he keeps representing people, it does seem that despite his incompetence, he seems rather successful. Let me give you an example. Would you not consider the current president of the United States to be incompetent? But wouldn't you at the same time consider him quite successful? No, my friend, life isn't fair. And this character is a perfect proof of that. --'''[[User:Svip|Svip]]'''<sup>[[User talk:Svip|Talk]]</sup> 18:50, 20 April 2008 (PDT) | :True. But due to the fact that he keeps representing people, it does seem that despite his incompetence, he seems rather successful. Let me give you an example. Would you not consider the current president of the United States to be incompetent? But wouldn't you at the same time consider him quite successful? No, my friend, life isn't fair. And this character is a perfect proof of that. --'''[[User:Svip|Svip]]'''<sup>[[User talk:Svip|Talk]]</sup> 18:50, 20 April 2008 (PDT) |
Latest revision as of 16:30, 12 April 2009
Hyper-Chicken
The "Hyper-Chicken" article has been labelled the following levels:
This article is thoroughly developed.
No focus level has been assigned.
I'm not convinced that he "seems to be successful", since he's been indited for incompetance. -- the preceding unsigned comment was written by 203.96.151.16.
- True. But due to the fact that he keeps representing people, it does seem that despite his incompetence, he seems rather successful. Let me give you an example. Would you not consider the current president of the United States to be incompetent? But wouldn't you at the same time consider him quite successful? No, my friend, life isn't fair. And this character is a perfect proof of that. --SvipTalk 18:50, 20 April 2008 (PDT)